...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of comparative psychology >How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: Transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios
【24h】

How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: Transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios

机译:大猩猩(盘尾猿,庞哥侏儒,泛潘尼士革,大猩猩大猩猩)在逆向奖励应急任务II中的表现如何:转移到新数量,长期保留和数量比率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We tested 6 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), 3 orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), 4 bonobos (Pan paniscus), and 2 gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in the reversed reward contingency task. Individuals were presented with pairs of quantities ranging between 0 and 6 food items. Prior to testing, some experienced apes had solved this task using 2 quantities while others were totally naive. Experienced apes transferred their ability to multiple-novel pairs after 6 to 19 months had elapsed since their initial testing. Two out of 6 naive apes (1 chimpanzee, 1 bonobo) solved the task-a proportion comparable to that of a previous study using 2 pairs of quantities. Their acquisition speed was also comparable to the successful subjects from that study. The ratio between quantities explained a large portion of the variance but affected naive and experienced individuals differently. For smaller ratios, naive individuals were well below 50% correct and experienced ones were well above 50%, yet both groups tended to converge toward 50% for larger ratios. Thus, some apes require no procedural modifications to overcome their strong bias for selecting the larger of 2 quantities.
机译:在反向奖励应急任务中,我们测试了6只黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes),3只猩猩(Pongo pygmaeus),4只bo黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)和2只大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla)。为每个人提供了0到6种食品之间的数量对。在测试之前,一些有经验的猿人使用2个数量解决了这一任务,而其他人则完全幼稚。自从最初的测试以来,有经验的猿猴在经过6到19个月的训练后便将它们的能力转移到了多对新猿中。每6个幼稚猿中就有2个(1个黑猩猩,1个bo黑猩猩)解决了这一任务-与以前的研究(使用2对数量)可比的比例相当。他们的习得速度也与该研究中成功的受试者相当。数量之间的比率解释了很大一部分差异,但对天真的和有经验的个体的影响不同。对于较小的比率,幼稚的个体正确率远低于50%,有经验的个体则远高于50%,但是对于较大的比率,两组倾向于趋向于50%。因此,某些猿类无需进行任何程序修改即可克服其选择2个数量较大者的强烈偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号