...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Crop Improvement >Modeling Spatial Correlation Structure in Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Multi-Environment Trials
【24h】

Modeling Spatial Correlation Structure in Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) Multi-Environment Trials

机译:甘蔗(Saccharum spp。)多环境试验中空间相关结构的建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Comparative multi-environment trials (METs) of sugarcane genotypes are frequently conducted using a randomized complete-block design (RCBD) within environments. However, blocking does not always ensure spatial variation control because of differentialcompetition for resources among neighboring genotypes. Heterogeneity within trials may also cause between-trial hetero-cedasticity. This work aims to evaluate different linear mixed models (LMMs) that enable the analysis of spatial correlation and residual heterogeneity among trials for both tons of cane per hectare (TCH) and sucrose content (SC%) in three series of multi-environmental trials conducted to evaluate advanced sugarcane clones. A total of 16 sugarcane trials conducted at different sites and in different crop cycles (age) were analyzed. Individual (agexsite combination) and multi-environment analyses were performed. For SC%, the classic RCBD analysis within trial was adequate. For TCH, the anisotropic autoregressive model of order 1 (ARlxARl) was the best to compare genotype means in most trials, allowing gain in information equivalent, on average, to the addition of 1.6 replicates to the original design. In the case of multi-environment analysis, theARlxARl within-trial with among-trialheteroscedasticity was the best model to compare variety means, both for TCH and SC%. The results showed how amore appropriate mixed model would help avoid commission of judgment errors in sugarcane variety recommendations.
机译:甘蔗基因型的比较多环境试验(METs)经常在环境中使用随机完整模块设计(RCBD)进行。但是,由于相邻基因型之间资源的竞争不同,所以分块方法并不总是确保空间变化控制。试验中的异质性也可能导致试验间异质性。这项工作旨在评估不同的线性混合模型(LMM),这些模型可以在三个系列的多环境试验中分析每公顷甘蔗吨(TCH)和蔗糖含量(SC%)的试验之间的空间相关性和残留异质性。评估先进的甘蔗克隆。分析了在不同地点和不同作物周期(年龄)进行的总共16项甘蔗试验。进行了个体(艾美石组合)和多环境分析。对于SC%,试验中的经典RCBD分析已足够。对于TCH,在大多数试验中,阶数1的各向异性自回归模型(AR1xAR1)是比较基因型均值的最佳方法,平均而言,与原始设计相比,平均增加1.6个重复信息即可获得信息。在多环境分析的情况下,试验内AR1xAR1与试验间异方差是比较TCH和SC%变异均数的最佳模型。结果表明,更合适的混合模型将如何避免在甘蔗品种推荐中引发判断错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号