首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Crohn’s & colitis >Immune response to influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with anti TNF-?? agents: Effects of combined therapy with immunosuppressants
【24h】

Immune response to influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with anti TNF-?? agents: Effects of combined therapy with immunosuppressants

机译:抗TNF-α治疗的炎性肠病患者对A / H1N1流感疫苗的免疫应答药物:联合使用免疫抑制剂的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and aims: Our first objective was to evaluate the immune response to the adjuvanted 2009 A/H1N1 pandemic (pH1N1) vaccine in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with anti-TNF-?? alone or combined with immunosuppressants (IS). Second and third aims were the safety of pH1N1 vaccine and the effects on IBD clinical activity. Methods: 36 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 26 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and thirty-one healthy control (HC) subjects were enrolled. 47 patients were on anti TNF-?? maintenance monotherapy and 15 on anti TNF-?? combined with IS. Sera were collected at baseline (T0) and 4. weeks after the vaccination (T1) for antibody determination by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI). Disease activity was monitored at T0 and T1. Results: Seroprotective titers (??1:40) in patients were comparable to HC. Seroconvertion rate (??4 fold increase in HAI titer) was lower than HC in IBD patients (p = 0.009), either on anti TNF-?? monotherapy (p = 0.034) or combined with IS (p = 0.011). Geometric mean titer (GMT) of antibodies at T1 was significantly lower in patients on combined therapy versus those on monotherapy (p = 0.0017) and versus HC (p = 0.011). The factor increase of GMT at T1 versus T0 was significantly lower in IBD patients versus HC (p = 0.042), and in those on combined immunosuppression, both versus monotherapy (p = 0.0048) and HC (p = 0.0015). None of the patients experienced a disease flare. Conclusion: Our study has shown a suboptimal response to pH1N1 vaccine in IBD patients on therapy with anti TNF-?? and IS compared to those on anti-TNF-?? monotherapy and HC. ? 2012 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation.
机译:背景与目的:我们的首要目标是评估在接受抗TNF-α治疗的炎性肠病(IBD)患者中,对2009年辅助A / H1N1大流行(pH1N1)疫苗的免疫反应。单独或与免疫抑制剂(IS)组合使用。第二和第三个目标是pH1N1疫苗的安全性以及对IBD临床活性的影响。方法:招募了36名克罗恩病(CD)患者和26名溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者和31名健康对照(HC)患者。 47例患者接受抗TNF-α治疗维持单一疗法,抗TNF-α15?与IS结合。在基线(T0)和疫苗接种后(T1)4周收集血清,以通过血凝抑制(HAI)测定抗体。在T0和T1监测疾病活动。结果:患者的血清保护滴度(?? 1:40)与HC相当。无论是抗TNF-α治疗,IBD患者的血清转化率(HAI滴度的Δε4增加4倍)均低于HC(p = 0.009)。单一疗法(p = 0.034)或与IS联用(p = 0.011)。联合治疗的患者在T1时抗体的几何平均滴度(GMT)显着低于单一治疗(p = 0.0017)和HC(p = 0.011)。与单一疗法(p = 0.0048)和HC(p = 0.0015)相比,IBD患者与HC(T = 0.042)以及联合免疫抑制的患者在T1和T0时GMT的升高幅度均明显较低。没有患者经历疾病发作。结论:我们的研究表明,抗TNF-α治疗对IBD患者的pH1N1疫苗反应欠佳。和IS与抗TNF-α相比单一疗法和HC。 ? 2012年欧洲克罗恩氏和结肠炎组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号