...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of critical care >Re: Letter by Spronk et al entitled 'Regional citrate anticoagulation does not prolong filter survival during CVVH'
【24h】

Re: Letter by Spronk et al entitled 'Regional citrate anticoagulation does not prolong filter survival during CVVH'

机译:回复:Spronk等人的信,标题为“区域性柠檬酸盐抗凝不会延长CVVH期间滤器的存活时间”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In reply to the correspondence of Spronk et al , we generally agree with several considerations that have been highlighted and offer the following dialogue.We concur that a number of factors contribute to filter circuit life span, specifically patient-related or catheter-related factors, chosen modality of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and ultrafiltration and blood flow rates as outlined in the letter by Spronk et al .Furthermore, we acknowledge that our study had limitations that necessitate consideration and could potentially have influenced the observed difference in filter circuit life span between regional citrate (RCA) and systemic heparin anticoagulation (SHA) . First, we were unable to incorporate data on individual filter transmembrane pressure, specific patient-related factors (eg, hematocrit, activate partial thromboplastin time), and selected catheter-related factors (eg, position, age, and size of catheter). Second, although our study included 4 centers, the protocol for CRRT was instituted regionally through the Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, for the Calgary Health Region. Therefore, our data in essence represent the experience of a single large center that will undoubtedly vary if compared with other single center studies, such as the data described by Spronk et al . This is significant because those differences may reflect local practice, institutional experience, and other aspects of CRRT such as available technology (eg, CRRT machines and types/sizes of filters), modalities, methods for anticoagulation (eg, commercially available citrate vs pharmacy specific), and numerous other logistic factors. Third, our study was an observational study and not a blinded randomized comparison of the 2 methods of anticoagulation. Finally, we did not integrate other potentially important outcomes such as clinically relevant thrombocytopenia, bleeding episodes, need for blood product transfusion, or overall cost.
机译:为了回应Spronk等人的信件,我们通常同意突出显示的几个注意事项,并提供以下对话。我们同意,影响过滤器电路寿命的因素很多,特别是与患者相关或与导管相关的因素, Spronk等人在信中概述的连续肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)的选择方式,超滤和血流速率。此外,我们认识到我们的研究存在局限性,需要加以考虑,并且可能会影响观察到的滤过回路差异柠檬酸盐(RCA)和全身肝素抗凝(SHA)之间的寿命。首先,我们无法合并有关单个滤膜跨膜压,与患者相关的特定因素(例如,血细胞比容,激活部分凝血活酶时间)和所选与导管相关的因素(例如,导管的位置,年龄和大小)的数据。其次,尽管我们的研究包括4个中心,但CRRT协议是通过加拿大卡尔加里大学卡尔加里大学重症医学系针对卡尔加里健康地区制定的。因此,我们的数据从本质上讲代表了单个大型中心的经验,如果与其他单个中心的研究相比,无疑会有所不同,例如Spronk等人描述的数据。这很重要,因为这些差异可能反映了当地的实践,机构的经验以及CRRT的其他方面,例如可用的技术(例如CRRT机器和过滤器的类型/尺寸),方式,抗凝方法(例如,市售的柠檬酸盐vs特定于药房) ),以及众多其他物流因素。第三,我们的研究是观察性研究,而不是两种抗凝方法的盲目随机比较。最后,我们没有整合其他潜在的重要结局,例如临床相关的血小板减少症,出血发作,输血需求或总成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号