...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical densitometry >Official Positions for FRAX(R) clinical regarding prior fractures from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(R).
【24h】

Official Positions for FRAX(R) clinical regarding prior fractures from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(R).

机译:国际临床密度测定学会和国际骨质疏松基金会关于FRAX®的关于先前骨折的临床正式职位。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 2010 Position Development Conference addressed four questions related to the impact of previous fractures on 10-year fracture risk as calculated by FRAX((R)). To address these questions, PubMed was searched on the keywords "fracture, epidemiology, osteoporosis." Titles of retrieved articles were reviewed for an indication that risk for future fracture was discussed. Abstracts of these articles were reviewed for an indication that one or more of the questions listed above was discussed. For those that did, the articles were reviewed in greater detail to extract the findings and to find additional past work and citing works that also bore on the questions. The official positions and the supporting literature review are presented here. FRAX((R)) underestimates fracture probability in persons with a history of multiple fractures (good, A, W). FRAX((R)) may underestimate fracture probability in individuals with prevalent severe vertebral fractures (good, A, W). While there is evidence that hip, vertebral, and humeral fractures appear to confer greater risk of subsequent fracture than fractures at other sites, quantification of this incremental risk in FRAX((R)) is not possible (fair, B, W). FRAX((R)) may underestimate fracture probability in individuals with a parental history of non-hip fragility fracture (fair, B, W). Limitations of the methodology include performance by a single reviewer, preliminary review of the literature being confined to titles, and secondary review being limited to abstracts. Limitations of the evidence base include publication bias, overrepresentation of persons of European descent in the published studies, and technical differences in the methods used to identify prevalent and incident fractures. Emerging topics for future research include fracture epidemiology in non-European populations and men, the impact of fractures in family members other than parents, and the genetic contribution to fracture risk.
机译:根据FRAX(R)计算,2010年职位发展会议讨论了与先前骨折对10年骨折风险的影响有关的四个问题。为了解决这些问题,在PubMed上搜索了“骨折,流行病学,骨质疏松症”关键字。对检索到的文章标题进行了审查,以表明已讨论了未来骨折的风险。评论了这些文章的摘要,以表明已讨论了上面列出的一个或多个问题。对于那些这样做的文章,将对文章进行更详细的审查,以提取研究结果,并找到对这些问题也无聊的其他以往工作和引用作品。此处列出了官方立场和支持性文献综述。 FRAX(R)低估了具有多处骨折史(good,A,W)的人的骨折可能性。 FRAX(R)可能低估了普遍存在严重椎骨骨折(好,A,W)的个体的骨折可能性。尽管有证据表明髋部,椎骨和肱骨骨折比其他部位的骨折似乎具有更大的后续骨折风险,但无法在FRAX(R)中量化这种增加的风险(公平,B,W)。 FRAX(R)可能低估具有父母非髋关节脆性骨折史(公平,B,W)的个体的骨折可能性。该方法的局限性包括由一位审稿人进行的表演,对文献的初步评论仅限于标题,而第二篇评论则仅限于摘要。证据基础的局限性包括发表偏见,发表的研究中欧洲血统的人过多,以及用于识别普遍骨折和意外骨折的方法的技术差异。未来研究的新兴话题包括非欧洲人口和男性中的骨折流行病学,骨折对父母以外的家庭成员的影响以及遗传对骨折风险的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号