...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chromatography, A: Including electrophoresis and other separation methods >Analysis of neutral surfactants by non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis using an electroosmotic flow reversal
【24h】

Analysis of neutral surfactants by non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis using an electroosmotic flow reversal

机译:使用电渗流反向通过非水毛细管电泳分析中性表面活性剂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The separation of KM 20, that is in fact a mixture of non-ionic surfactants, was carried out by non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis. This complex mixture resulting from the condensation of ethylene oxide with fatty alcohols does not have chromophoric moieties. So, we analysed it after derivatization by means of 3,5-dinitrobenzoyl chloride. The proposed approach is based both on the formation of complexes with alkaline or ammonium cations in methanol and on the utilisation of a positively charged capillary. From a comparative study on the capillary treatment procedure, we used hexadimethrine bromide as electroosmotic flow reverser in order to obtain both repeatable analyses and good resolutions of the largest KM 20 oligomers. Then, among the five cations used to form complexes with KM 20, we pointed out that ammonium cation led to the best resolutions. Moreover, we evidenced that the counter-ion of this cation had a great influence on resolution because it modified the magnitude of electroosmotic flow. Ion pair formation that is more or less strong between ammonium and its counter-ion was involved in this variation of electroosmotic flow. So, we calculated the association constants for various ammonium salts in methanol. Then, using ammonium chloride as background electrolyte, we optimised the concentration of this salt, in methanol, in order to reach the optimal separation of KM 20 oligomers. Thus, a baseline separation was obtained by using 6 x 10(-2) mol/L NH4Cl as running electrolyte. In these conditions, we separated, in about 30 min, more than 30 oligomers of KM 20. The distribution of these oligomers that was determined from the optimal separation, appeared consistent with that obtained from HPLC analyses. Indeed, we determined that the mean ethoxylation number was equal to 18 while its real value is equal to 20. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:KM 20(实际上是非离子表面活性剂的混合物)的分离是通过非水毛细管电泳进行的。由环氧乙烷与脂肪醇缩合得到的这种复杂混合物不具有发色部分。因此,我们在通过3,5-二硝基苯甲酰氯衍生化后进行了分析。所提出的方法既基于在甲醇中与碱性或铵阳离子形成的配合物,也基于利用带正电的毛细管。通过对毛细管处理程序的比较研究,我们使用溴化己二甲醚作为电渗流反向器,以便获得最大的KM 20低聚物的可重复分析和良好的分离度。然后,在用于与KM 20形成配合物的五个阳离子中,我们指出铵阳离子导致最佳分离度。此外,我们证明了该阳离子的抗衡离子对分离度有很大影响,因为它改变了电渗流的大小。铵离子及其反离子之间的离子对形成或多或少都与电渗流的这种变化有关。因此,我们计算了甲醇中各种铵盐的缔合常数。然后,使用氯化铵作为背景电解质,我们优化了该盐在甲醇中的浓度,以实现KM 20低聚物的最佳分离。因此,通过使用6 x 10(-2)mol / L NH4Cl作为运行电解质获得基线分离。在这些条件下,我们在约30分钟内分离了KM 20的30多个低聚物。从最佳分离中确定的这些低聚物的分布与从HPLC分析获得的分布相一致。实际上,我们确定平均乙氧基化数等于18,而其实际值等于20。(c)2005 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号