首页> 外文期刊>Journal of computer assisted tomography >Prospective examination of patients suspected of having appendicitis using new computed tomography criteria including 'maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm'.
【24h】

Prospective examination of patients suspected of having appendicitis using new computed tomography criteria including 'maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm'.

机译:使用新的计算机断层扫描标准(包括“腔内阑尾液的最大深度大于2.6 mm”)对怀疑患有阑尾炎的患者进行前瞻性检查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to perform prospective computed tomography (CT) examination of patients suspected of having appendicitis to determine whether our criteria (which include the new criterion "maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm") are useful for improving sensitivity and/or specificity in comparison with conventional major criteria. METHODS: Two hundred eighty consecutive patients older than 15 years old and suspected of having appendicitis were examined using CT. We prospectively diagnosed appendicitis when a patient satisfied the following criteria (our criteria): (A) maximum appendiceal diameter greater than 6 mm in the presence or the absence of periappendiceal inflammation, (B) maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm, and (C) absence of an alternative lesion explaining the clinical manifestations. These patients were also prospectively examined using conventional major criteria (excluded criterion B from our criteria). Computed tomography findings were compared with the findings at surgery, pathology, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Use of our criteria yielded a sensitivity of 97.3% (109/112), a specificity of 100% (168/168), and an accuracy of 98.9% (277/280) for the diagnosis of appendicitis. Using conventional major criteria, these values were 66.1% (74/112), 100% (168/168), and 86.4% (242/280), respectively, and sensitivity was lower than the value obtained using our criteria (P < 0.001 by the MacNemer test), although there is no significant difference in specificity between these criteria (P = 1 by the MacNemer test). CONCLUSIONS: Our criteria can improve sensitivity in comparison with conventional major criteria because our criteria enabled us to differentiate appendicitis without periappendiceal inflammation from a normal appendix.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是对怀疑患有阑尾炎的患者进行前瞻性计算机体层摄影(CT)检查,以确定我们的标准(包括新标准“管腔内阑尾液最大深度大于2.6 mm”)是否对与传统的主要标准相比,提高了敏感性和/或特异性。方法:使用CT检查连续280例年龄大于15岁且怀疑患有阑尾炎的患者。当患者满足以下标准(我们的标准)时,我们就可以诊断为阑尾炎:(A)在存在或不存在阑尾周围炎症的情况下最大阑尾直径大于6 mm,(B)腔内阑尾液最大深度大于2.6 mm (C)没有其他病变可解释临床表现。还使用常规主要标准(我们的标准中不包括标准B)对这些患者进行了前瞻性检查。将计算机断层扫描的发现与手术,病理和临床随访的发现进行比较。结果:使用我们的标准得出的阑尾炎诊断敏感性为97.3%(109/112),特异性为100%(168/168),准确性为98.9%(277/280)。使用常规主要标准,这些值分别为66.1%(74/112),100%(168/168)和86.4%(242/280),并且灵敏度低于使用我们的标准获得的值(P <0.001尽管这些标准之间的特异性没有显着差异(MacNemer检验的P = 1),但MacNemer检验的特异性没有显着差异。结论:与常规主要标准相比,我们的标准可提高敏感性,因为我们的标准使我们能够区分无阑尾周围炎症的阑尾炎与正常阑尾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号