首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >Use of postanesthesia discharge criteria to reduce discharge delays for inpatients in the postanesthesia care unit.
【24h】

Use of postanesthesia discharge criteria to reduce discharge delays for inpatients in the postanesthesia care unit.

机译:使用麻醉后出院标准来减少麻醉后护理单位住院病人的出院延误。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a set of predetermined discharge criteria, used by nurses, shortens the length of patient stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) without compromising safety. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Postoperative recovery area of a large, tertiary-care, academic hospital. PATIENTS: 1,198 adult, ASA physical status I, II, and III patients, 18 years or older, requiring general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Two groups of inpatients were followed. In the first group, over a 90 day period, all inpatients meeting study inclusion criteria were discharged by a physician (traditional discharge group [TDG]). This period was followed by a subsequent 90 day period in which a second group of patients were discharged by a PACU nurse using predetermined discharge criteria (discharge criteria group [DCG]). MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and discharge variables, including the time when the physician was called for an order, the time a discharge order was written, and the actual discharge time, were recorded. Other comparisons of various discharge variables included the time that discharge criteria were met, the actual discharge time, and the difference between these times. The frequency of PACU stays longer than 60 minutes, PACU discharge delays, and the time discharge criteria were met longer than 60 minutes were also compared between groups. Floor nurse satisfaction with patient status and any related morbidities noted were also measured. MAIN RESULTS: Length of PACU stay was significantly shorter (133.1 +/- 91.4 vs 101.7 +/- 53.7 min; P 0.05) for inpatients in the DCG group. Discharge delays were higher with physician discharge. The DCG had a lower number of patients with multiple delays. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Predetermined discharge criteria resulted in a 24% decrease in PACU time.
机译:研究目的:确定护士使用的一组预定出院标准是否缩短了患者在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)中的停留时间,而没有影响安全性。研究设计:前瞻性临床研究。地点:大型三级学术医院的术后恢复区。患者:1198名成人,ASA身体状况I,II和III患者,年龄18岁或以上,需要全身麻醉。干预措施:两组住院患者均接受随访。在第一组中,为期90天,所有符合研究入选标准的住院病人均由医生出院(传统出院组[TDG])。在此之后是随后的90天,其中PACU护士使用预定的出院标准(出院标准组[DCG])为第二组患者出院。测量:人口统计学和出院变量,包括医生被要求下达命令的时间,出院命令的写入时间以及实际出院时间。各种排放变量的其他比较包括满足排放标准的时间,实际排放时间以及这些时间之间的差。还比较了两组之间PACU的频率保持超过60分钟,PACU放电延迟以及满足放电标准的时间超过60分钟。还测量了地面护士对患者状况的满意程度以及所记录的任何相关发病率。主要结果:DCG组住院患者的PACU住院时间明显缩短(133.1 +/- 91.4 vs 101.7 +/- 53.7 min; P <0.05)。出院延迟随医生出院而增加。 DCG的患者数量较少,多次延误。两组之间不良事件的发生没有显着差异。结论:预定的出院标准导致PACU时间减少了24%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号