首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical anesthesia >Frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or integrated epidural-general anesthesia for total hip replacement.
【24h】

Frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or integrated epidural-general anesthesia for total hip replacement.

机译:在全麻,硬膜外麻醉或硬膜外-全身麻醉全髋置换过程中出现低血压和心动过缓的频率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during integrated epidural-general anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia alone. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open, multicenter study. SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at 7 University or Hospital Departments of anesthesia. PATIENTS: 210 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. INTERVENTIONS: Using a balanced randomization method, each hospital enrolled 30 consecutive patients who received integrated epidural-general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Occurrence of clinically relevant hypotension (systolic arterial blood pressure (BP) decrease >30% from baseline), or bradycardia (heart rate (HR) <45 bpm) requiring pharmacologic treatment were recorded, as well as routine cardiovascular parameters. Clinically relevant hypotension during induction of nerve block was reported in 13 patients receiving epidural block (18%) and 16 patients receiving epidural-general anesthesia (22%) (p = 0.67). Subsequently, 22 of the remaining 54 patients in the epidural-general anesthesia group (41%) developed hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia, as compared with 16 patients of the general anesthesia group (23%) (p = 0.049). No differences in HR or in frequency of bradycardia were observed in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The induction of general anesthesia in patients with an epidural block up to T10 increased the odds of developing clinically relevant hypotension as compared with those patients who received no epidural block, and was associated with a twofold increase of the odds of hypotension as compared with the use of epidural anesthesia alone.
机译:目的:评价硬膜外-全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉或硬膜外麻醉相比低血压和心动过缓的发生率。设计:前瞻性,随机,开放,多中心研究。地点:7所大学或医院麻醉科的住院麻醉。患者:210名接受选择性全髋置换的ASA身体状况I,II和III患者。干预措施:采用平衡随机分配方法,每家医院连续接受30例接受硬膜外-全身麻醉,硬膜外麻醉或全身麻醉的患者。测量和主要结果:记录临床相关的低血压(收缩压(BP)比基线下降> 30%)的发生率,或记录需要药物治疗的心动过缓(心率(HR)<45 bpm),以及常规心血管参数。据报道,在13例接受硬膜外阻滞的患者(18%)和16例接受硬膜外-全身麻醉的患者(22%)中,发生了神经阻滞过程中的临床相关性低血压(p = 0.67)。随后,硬膜外-全身麻醉组的其余54例患者中有22例(41%)在全身麻醉后出现低血压,相比之下,全身麻醉组的16例患者(23%)出现了低血压(p = 0.049)。三组均未观察到心率或心动过缓频率的差异。结论:与未接受硬膜外阻滞的患者相比,硬膜外阻滞至T10的患者进行全身麻醉增加了发生临床相关性低血压的几率,并且与低血压的几率相比增加了两倍单独使用硬膜外麻醉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号