首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >Autonomy support in primary care - Validation of the German version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire
【24h】

Autonomy support in primary care - Validation of the German version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire

机译:初级保健中的自主权支持-验证德语版《医疗保健气候调查表》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: There is a growing need for studies to measure how patients feel supported in their autonomy. The Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ) is an instrument to assess the physician's support to motivate the patient to take personal responsibility for his/her health. The aim of this study was to translate the HCCQ into German and validate the translated version, called the HCCQ-Deutschland (HCCQ-D). Study Design and Setting: In a cross-sectional study, we translated and culturally adapted the HCCQ, then administered the questionnaire to primary care patients from nine general practices in Germany. We used the European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice questionnaire (EUROPEP) to assess convergent validity. Subsequently, we performed Cronbach α to assess internal consistency and exploratory factor analysis to evaluate the underlying factor structure of the items. Results: Of 450 questionnaires, we included 351 (78%) in the final analysis. Internal consistency was high, with Cronbach α = 0.97. We found one major underlying factor similar to the English version: all items showed a scale correlation above 0.7. The mean values of the HCCQ correlated moderately (-0.5) with those of the EUROPEP. Conclusion: This study shows similar psychometric properties of the HCCQ-D as of the original English instrument. The HCCQ-D may be appropriate to explore German-speaking patients' perceived autonomy support in primary care settings.
机译:目标:越来越需要进行研究以衡量患者对自己的自主权的支持程度。卫生保健气候调查表(HCCQ)是一种评估医师支持以激发患者对其健康承担个人责任的工具。这项研究的目的是将HCCQ翻译成德语并验证翻译后的版本,即HCCQ-Deutschland(HCCQ-D)。研究设计和设置:在一项横断面研究中,我们翻译了HCCQ并对其进行了文化改编,然后向来自德国9个常规诊所的初级保健患者发放了问卷。我们使用了欧洲通用实践患者评估工作组问卷(EUROPEP)来评估收敛效度。随后,我们进行了Cronbachα评估内部一致性和探索性因素分析,以评估项目的潜在因素结构。结果:在450份问卷中,我们在最终分析中纳入了351份(78%)。内部一致性很高,Cronbachα= 0.97。我们发现了一个与英文版本相似的主要潜在因素:所有项目的规模相关性均高于0.7。 HCCQ的平均值与EUROPEP的平均值相关(-0.5)。结论:这项研究表明,HCCQ-D的心理测量特性与原始英语仪器相似。 HCCQ-D可能适合探讨会说德语的患者在初级保健环境中的自主支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号