首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Ultrasound biomicroscopy comparison of ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses.
【24h】

Ultrasound biomicroscopy comparison of ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

机译:后房型人工晶状体的ab interno和ab externo巩膜固定的超声生物显微镜比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOLs) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) to determine the centration of IOL optic and the position of the haptics in relation to the sulcus. SETTING: Kasr Eleini Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. METHODS: Consecutive patients with aphakia had ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PC IOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was used preoperatively to determine whether the eyes were unsuitable for capsule fixation and 3 and 6 months postoperatively, determine the position of the haptics in relation to the ciliary sulcus, and evaluate centration of the optic. RESULTS: Fifteen eyes of 14 patients were studied. Eight patients had ab externo fixation, and 7 had ab interno fixation. The haptics were located in the sulcus in 31% of cases with ab externo fixation and 29% with ab interno fixation. The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation, which are both blind procedures, resulted in comparable low rates of sulcus fixation.
机译:目的:使用超声生物显微镜(UBM)比较后房人工晶状体(PC IOL)的内,外巩膜外固定,以确定IOL视神经的中心以及相对于沟的触觉位置。地点:埃及开罗,开罗大学卡斯尔埃莱尼医院。方法:连续性无晶状体患者采用PC IOL的ab externo或ab interno巩膜固定。术前使用超声生物显微镜检查以确定眼睛是否不适合进行胶囊固定以及术后3个月和6个月,确定触觉相对于睫状沟的位置,并评估视神经的中心。结果:对14例患者的15只眼进行了研究。 8例患者进行了外固定,其中7例进行了内固定。 31%的腹部外固定支架和29%的腹部内固定支架的触觉位于沟内。差异无统计学意义。结论:内盲和外突巩膜固定均为盲法,导致沟内固定率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号