首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes.
【24h】

Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes.

机译:视力障碍问卷在测量白内障手术结局中的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To test the validity of the Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaire in a cataract population. SETTING: Flinders Eye Centre, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia. METHODS: Cataract patients recruited from a hospital waiting list completed the IVI questionnaire. The scale was assessed for fit to the Rasch model. Unidimensionality, item and person fit to the model, response category performance, differential item functioning (whether different subgroups responded differently), and targeting of item difficulty to patient ability were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, the IVI questionnaire performed well; there were ordered thresholds, person separation reliability was 0.97, and it was free from differential item functioning. One item (worry about eyesight getting worse) misfit the model and was removed. There was evidence of multidimensionality, indicating that the overall IVI score should be discarded; however, the 3 subscales (reading and accessing information, mobility and independence, and emotional well-being) functioned well. Several items calibrated differently in cataract patients compared with low-vision patients, indicating different issues are important to each population and that there is a need for population-specific conversion algorithms. Targeting of the IVI items was biased toward more impaired patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3 subscales of the IVI questionnaire functioned well in a cataract population. However, additional items targeting the less impaired patients, especially second-eye cataract patients, would improve measurement.
机译:目的:测试视力障碍(IVI)问卷对白内障人群的有效性。地点:南澳大利亚州阿德莱德弗林德斯大学弗林德斯医学中心弗林德斯眼科中心。方法:从医院候诊名单中招募的白内障患者填写IVI调查表。评估量表是否适合Rasch模型。评估了模型的一维性,项目和人员的适应性,响应类别的表现,不同项目的功能(不同亚组的响应是否不同)以及针对患者能力的项目难度目标。结果:总体而言,IVI问卷表现良好。有一个有序的阈值,人员分离的可靠性为0.97,并且没有差异项功能。其中一项(担心视力变差)与模型不匹配,因此被删除。有多维证据表明,应将整体IVI分数丢弃;但是,这三个分量表(阅读和访问信息,流动性和独立性以及情感幸福感)运作良好。与低视力患者相比,白内障患者校准的几项指标不同,这表明不同的问题对每个人群都很重要,并且需要针对人群的转换算法。 IVI项目的目标偏向于更多的患者。结论:IVI问卷的3个分量表在白内障人群中表现良好。但是,针对受损程度较小的患者(尤其是第二眼白内障患者)的其他项目将改善测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号