首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Intraocular lens calculations after refractive surgery.
【24h】

Intraocular lens calculations after refractive surgery.

机译:屈光手术后的人工晶状体计算。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of refractive surgery on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, compare methods of IOL power calculation after refractive surgery, evaluate the effect of pre-refractive surgery refractive error on IOL deviation, review the literature on determining IOL power after refractive surgery, and introduce a formula for IOL calculation for use after refractive surgery for myopia. SETTING: Laser & Corneal Surgery Associates and Center for Ocular Tear Film Disorders, New York, New York, USA. METHODS: This retrospective noncomparative case series comprised 21 patients who had uneventful cataract extraction and IOL implantation after previous uneventful myopic refractive surgery. Six methods of IOL calculation were used: clinical history (IOL(HisK)), clinical history at the spectacle plane (IOL(HisKs)), vertex (IOL(vertex)), back-calculated (IOL(BC)), calculation based on average keratometry (IOL(avgK)), and calculation based on flattest keratometry (IOL(flatK)). Each method result was compared to an "exact" IOL (IOL(exact)) that would have resulted in emmetropia and then compared to the pre-refractive surgery manifest refraction using linear regression. The paired t test was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: The IOL(HisKs) was the most accurate method for IOL calculations, with a mean deviation from emmetropia of -0.56 diopter +/-1.59 (D), followed by the IOL(BC) (+1.06 +/- 1.51 D), IOL(vertex) (+1.51 +/- 1.95 D), IOL(flatK) (-1.72 +/- 2.19 D), IOL(HisK) (-1.76 +/- 1.76 D), and IOL(avgK) (-2.32 +/- 2.36 D). There was no statistical difference between IOL(HisKs) and IOL(exact) in myopic eyes. The power of IOL(flatK) would be inaccurate by -(0.47x+0.85), where x is the pre-refractive surgery myopic SE (SEQ(m)). Thus, without adjusting IOL(flatK), most patients would be left hyperopic. However, when IOL(flatK) is adjusted with this formula, it would not be statistically different from IOL(exact). CONCLUSIONS: For IOL power selection in previously myopic patients,a predictive formula to calculate IOL power based only on the pre-refractive surgery SEQ(m) and current flattest keratometry readings was not statistically different from IOL(exact). The IOL(HisKs), which was also not statistically different from IOL(exact), requires pre-refractive surgery keratometry readings that are often not available to the cataract surgeon.
机译:目的:要评估屈光手术对人工晶状体(IOL)屈光度数的影响,比较屈光手术后的IOL屈光度数计算方法,评估屈光手术前屈光度数对IOL屈光度的影响,回顾有关确定屈光度数的方法屈光手术,并介绍了用于近视屈光手术后的IOL计算公式。地点:美国纽约激光与角膜外科协会和眼泪膜疾病中心。方法:该回顾性非对照病例系列包括21例先前进行过无畸形近视屈光手术后无畸形白内障摘除和人工晶体植入的患者。使用了6种IOL计算方法:临床病史(IOL(HisKs)),眼镜平面的临床病史(IOL(HisKs)),顶点(IOL(vertex)),反算(IOL(BC)),基于计算平均角膜曲率(IOL(avgK)),并根据最平坦的角膜曲率(IOL(flatK))进行计算。将每种方法的结果与可能导致正视的“精确” IOL(IOL(精确))进行比较,然后与使用线性回归的屈光手术前屈光度进行比较。配对t检验用于确定统计学显着性。结果:IOL(HisKs)是最准确的IOL计算方法,与正视眼的平均偏差为-0.56屈光度+/- 1.59(D),其次是IOL(BC)(+1.06 +/- 1.51 D) ,IOL(顶点)(+1.51 +/- 1.95 D),IOL(flatK)(-1.72 +/- 2.19 D),IOL(HisK)(-1.76 +/- 1.76 D)和IOL(avgK)(- 2.32 +/- 2.36 D)。近视眼的IOL(HisKs)和IOL(精确)之间无统计学差异。 IOL(flatK)的功效可能不等于-(0.47x + 0.85),其中x是屈光手术前近视SE(SEQ(m))。因此,如果不调整IOL(flatK),大多数患者将被远视。但是,当使用此公式调整IOL(flatK)时,它与IOL(exact)在统计上没有区别。结论:对于以前近视患者的IOL屈光度选择,仅基于屈光手术前的SEQ(m)和当前最平坦的角膜曲率读数来计算IOL屈光度的预测公式与IOL(精确度)无统计学差异。 IOL(HisKs)与IOL(精确)在统计学上也没有差异,它需要屈光手术前的角膜曲率测量读数,而白内障外科医生通常无法获得这些读数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号