...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Correlation of infrared pupillometers and CCD-camera imaging from aberrometry and videokeratography for determining scotopic pupil size.
【24h】

Correlation of infrared pupillometers and CCD-camera imaging from aberrometry and videokeratography for determining scotopic pupil size.

机译:红外瞳孔计和像差法和视频角膜描记法的CCD相机成像的相关性,用于确定暗视瞳孔大小。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: To compare 2 infrared pupillometers with a videokeratographer and 2 aberrometers for the determination of scotopic pupil size. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Methods: The pupil diameter was measured in 100 eyes of 51 patients after 2 minutes of dark adaptation using the following devices: digital infrared pupillometer (Procyon Instruments Ltd.), handheld infrared pupillometer (Colvard) (Oasis Medical), Zywave(R) aberrometer (Bausch & Lomb), Wasca aberrometer (Asclepion-Meditec-Zeiss), and Orbscan(R) II topography system (Bausch & Lomb Surgical). Measurements taken with the Procyon pupillometer were considered reference values for comparison with the other devices. Statistical evaluation was performed using the Bland-Altmann method for comparison of measurement techniques. Results: The mean pupil size was 6.10 mm +/- 0.86 (SD) with the Procyon pupil- lometer, 5.68 +/- 1.07 mm with the Colvard pupillometer, 5.91 +/- 1.01 mm with the Zywave aberrometer with the fixating target turned off, 5.09 +/- 1.14 mm with the Zywave aberrometer with the fixating target turned on, 5.59 +/- 0.99 mm with the Wasca aberrometer, and 3.75 +/- 0.67 mm with the Orbscan topographer. The limits of agreement were smallest for measurements between Procyon and Colvard and largest for measurements between Procyon and Orbscan. The sign test revealed statistically significant differences for all devices compared with the Procyon pupillometer (P<.001 in all cases) except the Zywave aberrometer with the fixating target turned off (P = .13). Conclusions: The Zywave wavefront sensor with the fixating target turned off using the study settings and light conditions provided measurements of scotopic pupil diameter that were closest to the reference values (Procyon). With the other devices (Colvard pupillometer, Zywave aberrometer with the fixating target switched on, Wasca aberrometer, and Orbscan topographer), the difference was statistically significant.
机译:目的:将2个红外瞳孔计与一个视频角膜描记器和2个像差计进行比较,以确定暗视瞳孔的大小。地点:德国美因河畔约翰·沃尔夫冈·歌德大学眼科。方法:在黑暗适应2分钟后,使用以下设备在51位患者的100只眼中测量瞳孔直径:数字红外瞳孔计(Procyon Instruments Ltd.),手持式红外瞳孔计(Colvard)(Oasis Medical),Zywave®像差计(Bausch&Lomb Surgical),Wasca像差仪(Asclepion-Meditec-Zeiss)和Orbscan®II地形系统(Bausch&Lomb Surgical)。使用Procyon瞳孔计进行的测量被视为参考值,可与其他设备进行比较。使用Bland-Altmann方法进行统计评估以比较测量技术。结果:Procyon瞳孔计的平均瞳孔大小为6.10 mm +/- 0.86(SD),Colvard瞳孔计的平均瞳孔大小为5.68 +/- 1.07 mm,Zywave像差仪的视线为固定目标时,平均瞳孔大小为5.91 +/- 1.01 mm ,使用固定目标的Zywave像差仪为5.09 +/- 1.14毫米,Wasca像差仪为5.59 +/- 0.99毫米以及Orbscan地形图仪为3.75 +/- 0.67毫米。对于Procyon和Colvard之间的测量,协议的限制最小,而对于Procyon和Orbscan之间的测量,协议的限制最大。符号测试显示与Procyon瞳孔计相比,所有设备在统计学上都有显着差异(在所有情况下,P <.001),除了固定目标关闭的Zywave像差仪(P = 0.13)。结论:使用研究设置和光照条件关闭了具有固定目标的Zywave波前传感器,可以提供最接近参考值(Procyon)的暗视瞳孔直径的测量值。使用其他设备(Colvard瞳孔计,固定目标已打开的Zywave像差仪,Wasca像差仪和Orbscan地形图仪),差异具有统计学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号