...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Foldable versus rigid intraocular lenses in conjunction with pars plana vitrectomy and other vitreoretinal procedures.
【24h】

Foldable versus rigid intraocular lenses in conjunction with pars plana vitrectomy and other vitreoretinal procedures.

机译:折叠式和刚性人工晶状体结合pars平板玻璃体切除术和其他玻璃体视网膜手术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the results of foldable acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation through a clear corneal incision with those of rigid IOL implantation in eyes having pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Setting: Tertiary referral-based university institute. Methods: A consecutive retrospective comparative chart review was performed in all eyes that had PPV and foldable IOL implantation between May 15, 1999, and November 1, 2000 (n = 30), and all eyes that had PPV and rigid IOL implantation between April 1, 1996, and May 14, 1999 (n = 30). Preoperative baseline data and postoperative outcome data were recorded. Pars plana vitrectomy and associated vitreoretinal procedures were performed as indicated according to individual circumstances. A minimum of 1 week of follow-up information was available for all eyes. Results: Baseline characteristics in both groups of patients, including age, sex, eye involved, and phakic state, were similar. The preoperative visual acuities were also similar, ranging from 20/30to hand motions; the mean visual acuity was 20/200. The IOL was implanted in all eyes uneventfully and did not restrict fundoscopy. The mean follow-up was significantly longer in the rigid IOL group (20 months) than in the foldable IOL group (7 months) (P<.001), probably because of the earlier case acquisition. The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuity was 20/200 in the foldable IOL group and 20/100 in the rigid IOL group. There was no difference between the 2 groups in the rate of postoperative retinal detachment, recurrent macular hole, or repeat PPV. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) on the first postoperative day was more common in the rigid IOL group than in the foldable IOL group (P =.078) because more patients in the rigid IOL group had surgery for diabetic ocular complications and these patients had a greater IOP rise. Conclusion: Acrylic IOLs can be safely implanted in conjunction with PPV in selected cases.
机译:目的:比较通过透明角膜切口将可折叠丙烯酸人工晶状体(IOL)植入的结果与采用平面玻璃体切除术(PPV)的眼睛中刚性IOL植入的结果进行比较。地点:基于大专推荐的大学学院。方法:对1999年5月15日至2000年11月1日之间所有PPV和可折叠人工晶状体植入的眼睛(n = 30)和4月1日之间所有PPV和刚性IOL植入的眼睛进行连续回顾性比较图审查。 ,1996年和1999年5月14日(n = 30)。记录术前基线数据和术后结果数据。根据具体情况,进行了pars平板玻璃体切除术和相关的玻璃体视网膜手术。至少有1周的跟踪信息可供所有人使用。结果:两组患者的基线特征,包括年龄,性别,受累眼和晶状体状态相似。术前视力也相似,从20/30到手势。平均视力为20/200。 IOL植入所有眼睛的过程均不均匀,并且不限制眼底镜检查。刚性IOL组(20个月)的平均随访时间比可折叠IOL组(7个月)的平均随访时间显着更长(P <.001),这可能是由于较早的病例获得。折叠式IOL组术后平均最佳矫正视力为20/200,而刚性IOL组为20/100。两组的术后视网膜脱离,复发性黄斑裂孔或重复PPV的发生率无差异。刚性IOL组术后第一天的眼内压(IOP)高于可折叠IOL组(P = .078),因为刚性IOL组中有更多的患者因糖尿病性眼部并发症而接受手术治疗更高的IOP上升。结论:在某些情况下,可以将丙烯酸类人工晶体与PPV一起安全植入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号