首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia.
【24h】

Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia.

机译:屈光性角膜切除术,散光PRK,激光原位角膜磨镶术和散光LASIK治疗近视的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To determine factors affecting refractive and visual outcomes in patients treated with astigmatic and spherical photorefractive keratectomy (A-PRK and PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (A-LASIK and LASIK). SETTING: University referral refractive surgery clinic. METHODS: Refractive and visual acuity results in 619 eyes of 388 consecutive patients having refractive surgery over a 2-year period by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into mild-to-moderate myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] less than -6.12 diopters [D]) and high myopia (SE -6.12 D or higher). Multivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Refractive results in flap-based and PRK-based procedures were comparable in mild-to-moderate myopia patients but were significantly better in high-myopia patients having flap-based procedures. Refractive stability was greater in flap-based procedures than in PRK-based procedures. Elliptical ablations yielded a marked reduction in the astigmatic cylinder in patients having A-LASIK and A-PRK, while spherical PRK induced small amounts of with-the-rule astigmatism. Complications were uncommon in both groups, consisting primarily of epithelial ingrowth in flap-based procedures and haze in PRK-based procedures. Multivariate regression identified the preoperative SE as a significant determinant of PRK outcomes (with higher success for lower myopia) and intraocular pressure as a minor determinant of outcomes in PRK-based and flap-based procedures. Logistic regression suggested that only the preoperative SE was a significant factor in predicting the likelihood of poor outcomes in PRK patients. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive outcomes were almost identical in patients having elliptical or spherical ablations with flap-based or PRK-based procedures. In eyes with mild-to-moderate myopia, there was little difference in refractive or visual outcomes between flap-based and PRK-based procedures; in eyes with high myopia, flap-based procedures offered more predictable refractive outcomes and better visual outcomes.
机译:目的:确定影响散光和球形光折射角膜切除术(A-PRK和PRK)和激光原位角膜磨镶术(A-LASIK和LASIK)的患者的屈光和视觉结果的影响因素。地点:大学转诊屈光手术诊所。方法:回顾性分析了由一名外科医生在2年时间内进行的屈光手术的388例连续患者的619眼屈光和视敏度结果。将患者分为轻度至中度近视(等效球镜[SE]小于-6.12屈光度[D])和高度近视(SE -6.12 D或更高)。进行了多元和逻辑回归分析。结果:在轻度至中度近视患者中,基于皮瓣和PRK的手术的屈光结果可比,但对于基于皮瓣的手术的高度近视患者,屈光检查的结果明显更好。与基于PRK的手术相比,基于皮瓣的手术的屈光稳定性更高。椭圆消融术可显着减少患有A-LASIK和A-PRK的患者的散光柱体,而球形PRK则可引起少量的规则散光。两组的并发症均不常见,主要由基于皮瓣的手术中的上皮向内生长和基于PRK的手术中的混浊引起。多因素回归分析表明,术前SE是PRK结局的重要决定因素(对于近视度数有较高的成功率),而眼压是PRK和皮瓣的结局决定因素的次要决定因素。 Logistic回归表明,只有术前SE是预测PRK患者预后不良的重要因素。结论:采用皮瓣或基于PRK的方法进行椭圆或球形消融的患者屈光结果几乎相同。在轻度至中度近视眼中,基于皮瓣的手术和基于PRK的手术在屈光或视觉结果上几乎没有差异;在高度近视眼中,基于皮瓣的手术可提供更可预测的屈光结果和更好的视觉效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号