首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Additional multifocal sulcus-based intraocular lens: Alternative to multifocal intraocular lens in the capsular bag
【24h】

Additional multifocal sulcus-based intraocular lens: Alternative to multifocal intraocular lens in the capsular bag

机译:额外的基于多焦沟的人工晶状体:囊袋中多焦点人工晶状体的替代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes of additional multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for sulcus fixation with those of standard multifocal IOLs in the capsular bag. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Rudolf-Virchow-Klinikum Glauchau, Glauchau, Germany. Design: Prospective controlled clinical trial. Methods: Eyes had phacoemulsification and implantation of a monofocal IOL in the capsular bag and an additional aberration-free diffractive IOL in the ciliary sulcus (multifocal add-on IOL group). Measurements of uncorrected and distance-corrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities; contrast sensitivity; and defocus curve were performed 3 months postoperatively. Results were compared with those in eyes with an aberration-correcting diffractive posterior chamber IOL (multifocal PC IOL group). Results: The multifocal add-on IOL group comprised 34 eyes of 20 patients and the multifocal PC IOL group, 31 eyes of 17 patients. Cataract surgery, IOL implantation, and the postoperative course were uneventful in all cases. There were no statistically significant differences in uncorrected and distance-corrected distance, intermediate, or near visual acuities between the 2 groups. The median uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.00 logMAR in both groups, and the median uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.10 logMAR in both groups. Contrast sensitivity testing yielded significantly better results in the multifocal add-on IOL group, especially at spatial frequencies over 1.5 cycles per degree. Defocus curves were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion: Visual performance with a multifocal diffractive add-on IOL was equivalent to that achieved with a commonly used multifocal diffractive PC IOL. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的:比较用于囊沟固定的其他多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的视觉结果与囊袋中标准多焦点人工晶状体的视觉结果。地点:德国格劳豪(Glauchau)鲁道夫-维克豪-克林尼克(Rudolf-Virchow-Klinikum Glauchau)眼科。设计:前瞻性对照临床试验。方法:眼睛在囊袋中超声乳化和植入单焦点人工晶状体,在睫状沟(多焦点附加人工晶状体组)中附加了一个无像差的衍射性人工晶状体。未矫正和经距离矫正的距离,中间和接近视力的测量;对比敏感度术后3个月行散焦曲线。将结果与矫正像差的后房后屈光度数(多焦点PC IOL组)的眼睛结果进行比较。结果:附加多焦点人工晶状体组包括20例患者的34眼,而多焦点PC人工晶体组包括17例患者的31眼。在所有情况下,白内障手术,人工晶体植入和术后病程均顺利。两组之间未矫正和经距离矫正的距离,中度或近视力在统计学上无显着差异。两组中位未矫正远视力中位数均为0.00 logMAR,两组中位未矫正远视力中位数为0.10 logMAR。对比灵敏度测试在多焦点附加IOL组中产生了明显更好的结果,尤其是在每度超过1.5个循环的空间频率下。两组的散焦曲线相似。结论:使用多焦点衍射附加IOL的视觉性能等同于常用的多焦点衍射PC IOL的视觉性能。财务披露:没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或专有利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号