...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry.
【24h】

Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry.

机译:公式选择:Hoffer Q,Holladay 1或SRK / T,在白内障手术后使用部分相干干涉法进行生物测定的8108眼屈光结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To assess how intraocular lens (IOL) formula choice affects refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using IOLMaster biometry. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Database study. METHODS: Hypothetical prediction errors were retrospectively calculated on prospectively collected data from electronic medical records using optimized Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas (Sofport AO and Akreos Fit IOLs) across a range of 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm axial length (AL) subgroups. RESULTS: In short eyes, the Hoffer Q had the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) for ALs from 20.00 to 20.99 mm. The Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 had a lower MAE than the SRK/T for ALs from 21.00 to 21.49 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in MAE for ALs from 21.50 to 21.99 mm. In medium eyes, there were no statistically significant differences in MAE for any IOL formula for ALs from 22.00 to 23.49 mm. For ALs from 23.50 to 25.99 mm, there was a trend toward lower MAEs for the Holladay 1, with statistically significant differences in 2 subgroups. In long eyes, the SRK/T had the lowest MAE, with statistically significant differences for ALs of 27.00 mm or longer. CONCLUSIONS: The Hoffer Q performed best for ALs from 20.00 to 20.99 mm, the Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 for ALs from 21.00 to 21.49 mm, and the SRK/T for ALs of 27.00 mm or longer. Using optimized constants, refractive outcomes of 40%, 75%, and 95% within +/-0.25 diopter (D), +/-0.50 D, and +/-1.00 D, respectively, were achievable. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes.
机译:目的:使用IOLMaster生物测定法评估白内障手术后人工晶状体(IOL)公式的选择如何影响屈光结果。地点:英国切尔滕纳姆,格洛斯特郡医院NHS基金会信托基金眼科。设计:数据库研究。方法:使用优化的Hoffer Q,Holladay 1和SRK / T公式(Sportport AO和Akreos Fit IOLs)在0.5毫米或1.0毫米轴向长度(AL)范围内,对来自电子病历的前瞻性收集数据进行假设性预测误差的追溯计算。 )子组。结果:在短眼中,Hoffer Q对于20.00至20.99 mm的AL具有最低的平均绝对误差(MAE)。 Hoffer Q和Holladay 1对于AL的MAE低于SRK / T,从21.00到21.49 mm。对于21.50至21.99 mm的AL,MAE的差异无统计学意义。在中等眼睛中,对于22.00至23.49 mm的AL,任何IOL公式的MAE均无统计学显着差异。对于从23.50到25.99 mm的AL,Holladay 1的MAE有降低的趋势,在2个亚组中有统计学上的显着差异。在较长的眼睛中,SRK / T的MAE最低,对于27.00 mm或更长的AL,具有统计学上的显着差异。结论:Hoffer Q对20.00至20.99 mm的AL表现最佳,Hoffer Q和Holladay 1对21.00至21.49 mm的AL表现最好,而SRK / T对27.00 mm或更长的AL表现最好。使用优化的常数,屈光度在+/- 0.25屈光度(D),+ /-0.50 D和+/- 1.00 D内分别达到40%,75%和95%。财务披露:没有任何作者对所提及的任何材料或方法有财务或所有权利益。在脚注中可以找到其他披露内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号