首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery
【24h】

Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery

机译:白内障手术后前房深度,人工晶状体位置和屈光结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: To assess postoperative intraocular lens (IOL) position in relation to the cornea and iris, compare 2 devices for anterior chamber depth (ACD) measurement, and assess the impact of these factors on postoperative refraction in phacoemulsification. Setting: Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Ume? University Hospital, Ume?, Sweden. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Methods: Biometry and measurement of the anterior segment were performed preoperatively and postoperatively with the partial coherence interferometry (PCI)-based IOLMaster and the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug device. Predicted refraction was calculated with ACD estimations according to the Haigis formula and was compared with the actual postoperative refraction. Changes in ACD and the distance between the cornea-iris and the iris-lens/IOL were assessed from Scheimpflug images. The theoretical refractive impact of differences in ACD was calculated. Results: The mean preoperative ACD and refractive prediction error, respectively, was 3.22 mm ± 0.37 (SD) and 0.41 ± 0.43 diopters (D) for the PCI device and 3.21 ± 0.35 mm and 0.41 ± 0.41 D for the Scheimpflug device; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD, cornea-iris distance, and iris-lens/IOL distance changes were 1.62 ± 0.38 mm, 0.78 ± 0.29 mm, and 0.85 ± 0.27 mm, respectively. The mean predicted refractive outcome from a 1.0 mm difference in ACD was 0.32 D. Conclusions: No difference was found between the measurement devices. Although the exact postoperative IOL position is difficult to predict, its impact on postoperative refraction was comparatively small compared with the impact of minor corneal curvature or axial length measurement errors. Financial Disclosure: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
机译:目的:要评估术后相对于角膜和虹膜的人工晶状体(IOL)位置,比较两种用于测量前房深度(ACD)的设备,并评估这些因素对超声乳化术中术后屈光的影响。地点:梅林大学临床科学/眼科?瑞典于默市大学医院。设计:诊断测试或技术的评估。方法:术前和术后均使用基于部分相干干涉术(PCI)的IOLMaster和Pentacam HR Scheimpflug装置进行生物测定和前段测量。根据Haigis公式,通过ACD估算来计算预测的屈光度,并将其与术后实际屈光度进行比较。通过Scheimpflug图像评估ACD的变化以及角膜虹膜与虹膜透镜/ IOL之间的距离。计算了ACD差异的理论折射影响。结果:PCI设备的平均术前ACD和屈光预测误差分别为3.22 mm±0.37(SD)和0.41±0.43屈光度(D),Scheimpflug设备为3.21±0.35 mm和0.41±0.41D。差异无统计学意义。平均ACD,角膜虹膜距离和虹膜透镜/ IOL距离变化分别为1.62±0.38 mm,0.78±0.29 mm和0.85±0.27 mm。 ACD相差1.0 mm的平均预测屈光结果为0.32D。结论:测量设备之间未发现差异。尽管确切的术后IOL位置很难预测,但与较小的角膜曲率或轴向长度测量误差的影响相比,其对术后屈光的影响相对较小。财务披露:两位作者都没有提及任何材料或方法的财务利益或专有利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号