...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical periodontology >Effect of air-polishing devices on the gingiva: histologic study in the Canine.
【24h】

Effect of air-polishing devices on the gingiva: histologic study in the Canine.

机译:空气抛光装置对牙龈的影响:犬的组织学研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Hirshberg A. Effect of air-polishing devices on the gingiva: histologic study in the Canine. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 329-334. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00678.x. (c) Blackwell Munksgaard, 2005. Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate histologically the immediate effect of two types of air-polishing devices (APDs) on the gingiva. Material and Methods: The buccal gingiva in four mongrel dogs was exposed to 5, 10 and 20 s of instrumentation, applying a hand-piece type of APD (HP-APD) PROPHYflex((R)) and a stand-alone type of APD (SA-APD) Jetpolisher(trade mark) in a split-mouth design. Immediately after treatment, the exposed gingiva was excised by sharp dissection and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. For each specimen, 15 sections, 20 mum apart, corresponding to the central part of the treated and control untreated gingiva were cut and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Stained sections were examined histomorphometrically for keratin width and epithelial cell layer (ECL) (prickle and basal cell layers) width. Extent of erosion was expressed as loss of keratin and ECL compared with control. Results: Microscopic examination presented changes in keratin and ECL, including keratin detachment and disruption of the normal ECL architecture. The erosive changes in the gingiva caused by both APD, positively correlated with instrumentation time (p<0.001) and type of instrument (p=0.008). Keratin loss was significantly higher for SA APD than for the HP APD in each time interval (p=0.019). Following exposure for 5 s, both APD caused a 25% loss of the ECL. Exposure for 10 and 20 s revealed a significantly greater ECL loss caused by the SA-APD than the HP-APD (p=0.018). Exposure for 20 s was the only time interval that presented the area of total epithelium erosion with SA-APD causing significantly more (p=0.002) areas of total epithelial erosion than the HP-APD. Conclusion: Gingiva exposure to air-polishing slurry delivered by APD caused localized trauma because of epithelial erosive changes with severity, positively correlated with instrumentation time and design principles of the applied APD. The clinician should be aware of the potential insult of the gingiva when applying the APD and careful precautions should be taken.
机译:Kozlovsky A,Artzi Z,Nemcovsky CE,Hirshberg A.空气抛光设备对牙龈的影响:犬的组织学研究。 J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32:329-334。 doi:10.1111 / j.1600-051X.2005.00678.x。 (c)Blackwell Munksgaard,2005年。摘要目的:本研究的目的是从组织学角度评估两种类型的空气抛光装置(APD)对牙龈的即时效果。材料和方法:用手持式APD(HP-APD)PROPHYflex®和独立式APD将四只杂种狗的颊齿龈暴露于5、10和20 s的仪器中(SA-APD)叉嘴式设计的Jetpolisher(商标)。治疗后,立即通过急剧解剖切除暴露的牙龈,并固定在10%的福尔马林缓冲液中。对于每个标本,切开15个切片,相隔20μm,分别对应于处理和对照的未处理牙龈的中央部分,并用苏木精和曙红染色。用组织形态计量学检查染色切片的角蛋白宽度和上皮细胞层(ECL)(皮刺和基底细胞层)宽度。与对照相比,侵蚀程度表示为角蛋白和ECL的丧失。结果:镜检显示角蛋白和ECL的变化,包括角蛋白脱离和正常ECL体系的破坏。由APD引起的牙龈侵蚀性变化与仪器安装时间(p <0.001)和仪器类型(p = 0.008)呈正相关。在每个时间间隔内,SA APD的角蛋白损失均显着高于HP APD(p = 0.019)。暴露5秒钟后,两个APD均导致ECL降低25%。暴露10 s和20 s显示,SA-APD引起的ECL损失明显大于HP-APD(p = 0.018)。暴露20 s是唯一一个出现时间间隔的时间间隔,该时间间隔显示了SA-APD引起的总上皮糜烂面积比HP-APD明显多(p = 0.002)。结论:牙龈暴露于APD输送的空气抛光浆会引起局部创伤,这是由于上皮侵蚀性变化的严重程度,与所用APD的检测时间和设计原理正相关。在使用APD时,临床医生应意识到可能对牙龈造成的伤害,并应采取谨慎的预防措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号