首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical periodontology >A systematic review of the effect of anti-infective therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis.
【24h】

A systematic review of the effect of anti-infective therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis.

机译:对抗感染疗法在种植体周围炎治疗中作用的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the treatment of peri-implantitis with special emphasis on the role of anti-infective therapy. No randomized controlled clinical trial was available for analysis. Of 145 peri-implant studies initially screened, 21 studies (six human and 15 animal studies) were analysed regarding the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis. A multitude of treatment regimens, including anti-infective therapy, was reported. The antibiotic regimens varied between studies. No standardized medication protocol was used. Type of antibiotic, dosage, duration and time for initiation of antibiotic treatment were different for all studies, but details were not always reported. A non-medicated control group was reported in one animal experiment only. The outcomes following anti-infective treatment of peri-implantitis are highly variable. The evidence for a consistent and clinically relevant advantage using antibiotics can be questioned in this context. There are to date no data available to support specific treatment protocols. It is suggested that randomized human controlled clinical trials for the treatment of peri-implantitis be initiated.
机译:该系统评价的目的是评估种植体周围炎的治疗,特别强调抗感染治疗的作用。没有随机对照临床试验可用于分析。在最初筛选的145例种植体周围研究中,对21项研究(六项人类研究和15项动物研究)进行了分析,以了解种植体周围炎的治疗结果。据报道,包括抗感染治疗在内的多种治疗方案。抗生素方案因研究而异。没有使用标准化的药物治疗方案。在所有研究中,抗生素类型,剂量,开始抗生素治疗的持续时间和时间均不同,但并非总是报道细节。仅在一项动物实验中报告了非药物对照组。种植体周围炎的抗感染治疗后的结果差异很大。在这种情况下,可以质疑使用抗生素具有一致和临床相关优势的证据。迄今为止,尚无可用于支持特定治疗方案的数据。建议开始用于治疗种植体周围炎的随机对照临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号