首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus vindesine plus cisplatin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: the Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study Group.
【24h】

Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus vindesine plus cisplatin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: the Japanese Taxotere Lung Cancer Study Group.

机译:多西他赛加顺铂与长春地辛加顺铂在IV期非小细胞肺癌患者中的III期随机试验:日本Taxotere肺癌研究组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Few randomized trials have demonstrated survival benefit of combination chemotherapy involving new agents plus cisplatin compared with classic combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary aim of this study was to test whether docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) improves survival compared with vindesine plus cisplatin (VdsC) in patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible, stage IV, chemotherapy-naive patients (n = 311) were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 3- or 4-week cycle, or vindesine 3 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. Cross-over administration of docetaxel and vindesine was prohibited for both treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, 302 patients were eligible for evaluation. The DC arm demonstrated significant improvements compared with the VdsC arm in overall response rates (37% v 21%, respectively; P <.01) and median survival times (11.3 v 9.6 months, respectively; P =.014). Two-year survival rates were 24% for the DC arm compared with 12% for the VdsC arm. The physical domain of the Quality of Life for Cancer Patients Treated with Anticancer Drugs measure was significantly better in the DC arm than in the VdsC arm (P =.020). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic and was more severe in the VdsC arm. CONCLUSION: As first-line treatment for stage IV NSCLC, DC resulted in greater clinical benefit in terms of response rate (with marked improvements in overall and 2-year survival rates) and quality of life than did treatment with VdsC.
机译:目的:很少有随机试验证明在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,与传统联合化疗相比,新药物加顺铂联合化疗的生存获益。这项研究的主要目的是测试多西他赛加顺铂(DC)与长春地西加顺铂(VdsC)相比在先前未经IV期NSCLC治疗的患者中是否提高生存率。患者和方法:符合条件的IV期,未接受化疗的患者(n = 311)在第1天随机分配接受多西他赛60 mg / m(2)静脉加顺铂80 mg / m(2)的患者。 3或4周的周期,或在第1、8和15天静脉注射长春地辛3 mg / m(2),在第4周的第1天静脉注射顺铂80 mg / m(2)。两个治疗组均禁止交叉使用多西他赛和长春地辛。结果:总共有302例患者符合评估条件。与VdsC组相比,DC组在总体缓解率(分别为37%对21%; P <.01)和中位生存时间(分别为11.3对9.6个月; P = .014)方面有显着改善。 DC组的两年生存率为24%,而VdsC组的为12%。在DC组中,抗癌药物治疗的癌症患者的生活质量的物理范围明显优于在VdsC组中(P = .020)。 VdsC组的毒性主要是血液学的,并且更为严重。结论:作为IV期NSCLC的一线治疗,与VdsC治疗相比,DC在缓解率(总体和两年生存率显着改善)和生活质量方面产生了更大的临床获益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号