首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Neuro-Oncology Working Group 01 trial of nimustine plus teniposide versus nimustine plus cytarabine chemotherapy in addition to involved-field radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of malignant glioma.
【24h】

Neuro-Oncology Working Group 01 trial of nimustine plus teniposide versus nimustine plus cytarabine chemotherapy in addition to involved-field radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of malignant glioma.

机译:尼莫斯汀加替尼泊苷与尼莫斯汀加阿糖胞苷的化学治疗以及恶性神经胶质瘤一线治疗的累及野外放疗相比,神经肿瘤工作组01试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: The role of chemotherapy in the primary treatment of malignant glioma remains controversial. The results from the German-Austrian Glioma trial (GAG, 1983 to 1988) demonstrated a survival benefit for chemotherapy using carmustine (BCNU) plus teniposide (VM26) over BCNU alone in addition to radiotherapy in patients with a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) more than 60. The Neuro-Oncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society therefore compared the efficacy of nimustine (ACNU) plus VM26 and ACNU plus cytarabine (Ara-C) chemotherapy in addition to standard radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, 375 patients were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy and cycles of ACNU 90 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and VM26 60 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 (n = 183), or ACNU 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and Ara-C 120 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 3 (n = 179), in 6-week intervals. Thirteen patients were not eligible after central neuropathology review. The remaining 362 patients had glioblastoma (n = 301) or anaplastic glioma (n = 61). RESULTS: Median survival and 2-year survival rates were 17.3 months and 25% for ACNU plus VM26, and 15.7 months and 29% for ACNU plus Ara-C in glioblastoma, and 60 months and 88% for ACNU plus VM26 and 62.5 months and 72% for ACNU plus Ara-C in anaplastic glioma. Multivariate analysis revealed no survival advantage for either arm or for subpopulations defined by histology, age, or KPS. Hematologic toxicity was more prominent in the ACNU plus Ara-C arm. CONCLUSION: The median survival times and 2-year survival rates for patients with anaplastic glioma and glioblastoma achieved in the NOA-01 trial compare favorably with historical trials and with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database. The toxicity profile favors ACNU plus VM26 for further evaluation.
机译:目的:化学疗法在恶性神经胶质瘤的主要治疗中的作用仍存在争议。德国-奥地利胶质瘤试验(GAG,1983年至1988年)的结果表明,卡诺汀(BCNU)加替尼泊苷(VM26)化疗比放疗对卡诺夫斯基性能评分(KPS)的患者具有生存优势。超过60。德国癌症协会的神经肿瘤工作组(NOA)因此比较了尼莫斯汀(ACNU)加VM26和ACNU加阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)化疗以及标准放疗对新诊断的恶性神经胶质瘤患者的疗效。患者与方法:1994年至2000年,随机分配375名患者接受放射治疗,并在第1天静脉给予ACNU 90 mg / m2(IV),在第1至3天进行VM26 60 mg / m2 IV周期(n = 183),或在第1天静脉输注ACNU 90 mg / m2,在第1至第3天静脉输注Ara-C 120 mg / m2(n = 179),间隔6周。中枢神经病理学检查后有13例患者不合格。其余362名患者患有胶质母细胞瘤(n = 301)或间变性胶质瘤(n = 61)。结果:胶质母细胞瘤中ACNU加VM26的中位生存期和2年生存率分别为17.3个月和25%,ACNU加Ara-C分别为15.7个月和29%,ACNU加VM26和62.5个月分别为60个月和88%和间变性神经胶质瘤中ACNU加Ara-C的比例为72%。多变量分析显示,无论是手臂还是组织学,年龄或KPS定义的亚群均无生存优势。 ACNU加Ara-C组的血液学毒性更为突出。结论:在NOA-01试验中获得的间变性胶质瘤和胶质母细胞瘤患者的中位生存时间和2年生存率与历史研究和放射治疗肿瘤学组数据库相比具有优势。毒性概况有利于ACNU加VM26进行进一步评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号