首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on the activity and efficacy of first-line cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
【24h】

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on the activity and efficacy of first-line cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

机译:辅助化疗联合或不联合蒽环类药物对转移性乳腺癌患者一线环磷酰胺,表阿霉素和氟尿嘧啶的活性和功效的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of previous adjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response (OR) rates of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) as first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three-hundred twenty-six assessable metastatic breast cancer patients entered onto four consecutive randomized trials performed in our Institution and North-West Oncology Group (GONO) cooperative centers from 1983 to 1994. Patients received CEF-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy and were then evaluated. One hundred forty-four patients (44%) did not receive previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and 143 (44%) and 39 (12%) patients received cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-based and anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. RESULTS: ORs to CEF chemotherapy were observed in 161 patients (49.4%). On univariate analysis, patients who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower probability of response than patients who did not: 43% versus 58% (P=.02). No difference between CMF-based (OR rate, 43%) and anthracycline-based (OR rate, 44%) adjuvant chemotherapy was observed. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=.005), bone as dominant metastatic site (P=.02), and previous hormonotherapy for metastatic disease (P=.005) were the most important factors in predicting a poor OR rate. The median PFS and OS times of the whole group were 9.8 and 17.9 months, respectively. Patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had a longer survival time (21.1 months) compared with patients previously treated with CMF-based (15.3 months) or anthracycline-based (15.8 months) adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant chemotherapy to be among the strongest prognostic factors associated with both a poor PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Previous adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects OR, PFS, and OS in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with the CEF regimen as first-line chemotherapy. No difference was observed between patients previously treated with CMF-based or anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
机译:目的:评估使用或不使用蒽环类药物的辅助化疗对用环磷酰胺,表阿霉素和氟尿嘧啶治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的总生存率(OS),无进展生存率(PFS)和客观反应率(OR)的影响( CEF)作为一线化疗。患者与方法:1983年至1994年,三百26例可评估的转移性乳腺癌患者参加了我们机构与西北肿瘤小组(GONO)合作中心进行的四次连续随机试验。患者首先接受基于CEF的化疗,线治疗,然后进行评估。 144例患者(44%)未曾接受过辅助化疗,分别有143例(44%)和39例(12%)患者接受了基于环磷酰胺,甲氨蝶呤和基于氟尿嘧啶(CMF)和基于蒽环类的辅助化疗。 。结果:161例患者(49.4%)观察到CEF化疗的OR。在单因素分析中,接受过辅助化疗的患者与未接受辅助化疗的患者相比,应答率明显降低:分别为43%和58%(P = .02)。在基于CMF的辅助化疗(OR率为43%)和基于蒽环类药物的辅助化疗(OR率为44%)之间没有差异。逐步logistic回归分析表明,辅助化疗(P = .005),骨为主要转移部位(P = .02)和以前的激素疗法治疗转移性疾病(P = .005)是预测不良OR率的最重要因素。 。整个组的中位PFS和OS时间分别为9.8和17.9个月。与先前接受基于CMF的辅助化疗(15.3个月)或基于蒽环类辅助化疗(15.8个月)的患者相比,未接受辅助化疗的患者的生存时间更长(21.1个月)。多变量分析证实辅助化疗是与不良PFS和OS相关的最强预后因素之一。结论:先前的辅助化疗对以一线化疗的CEF方案治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的OR,PFS和OS产生不利影响。先前接受过基于CMF或蒽环类的辅助化疗的患者之间没有观察到差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号