首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Oncology >Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a Multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Researc
【24h】

Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a Multiinstitutional Medical Research Council/European Organization for Researc

机译:博来霉素,依托泊苷和顺铂与博来霉素,依托泊苷和卡铂比较在转移性非精原细胞性生殖细胞癌预后良好的随机试验:多机构医学研究理事会/欧洲研究组织

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of carboplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (CEB) versus cisplatin plus etoposide and bleomycin (BEP) in first-line chemotherapy of patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 1989 and May 1993, a total of 598 patients with good-risk nonseminomatous germ cell tumors were randomized to receive four cycles of either BEP or CEB. In each cycle, the etoposide dose was 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3, and the bleomycin dose was 30 U on day 2. BEP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 or 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2. For CEB patients, the carboplatin dose was calculated from the glomerular filtration rate to achieve a serum concentration x time of 5 mg/mL x minutes. Chemotherapy was recycled at 21-day intervals to a total of four cycles. RESULTS: Of patients assessable for response, 253 of 268 (94.4%) of those allocated to receive BEP achieved a complete response, compared with 227 of 260 (87.3%) allocated to receive CEB (P = .009). There were 30 treatment failures in the 300 patients allocated to BEP and 79 in the 298 allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 26.9; P < .001), which led to failure-free rates at 1 year of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88% to 94%) and 77% (95% CI, 72% to 82%), respectively. There were 10 deaths in patients allocated to BEP and 27 in patients allocated to CEB (log-rank chi 2 = 8.77; P = .003), which led to 3-year survival rates of 97% (95% CI, 95% to 99%) and 90% (95% CI, 86% to 94%), respectively. CONCLUSION: With these drug doses and schedules, combination chemotherapy based on carboplatin was inferior to that based on cisplatin. This BEP regimen that contains moderate doses of etoposide and bleomycin is effective in the treatment of patients with good-prognosis metastatic nonseminoma.
机译:目的:该前瞻性随机多中心试验旨在评估卡铂联合依托泊苷和博来霉素(CEB)与顺铂联合依托泊苷和博来霉素(BEP)在高危非精原细胞生殖细胞肿瘤患者一线化疗中的疗效。患者与方法:1989年9月至1993年5月之间,共有598例高危非精原细胞性生殖细胞肿瘤患者被随机分配接受四个BEP或CEB周期治疗。在每个周期中,依托泊苷的剂量在第1、2和3天为120 mg / m2,博来霉素剂量在第2天为30U。BEP患者在第1-5天或第50天接受顺铂的剂量为20 mg / m2 / d在第1天和第2天为mg / m2。对于CEB患者,从肾小球滤过率计算出卡铂剂量,以使血清浓度x时间为5 mg / mL x分钟。化学疗法以21天的间隔被回收,共四个周期。结果:在可评估缓解的患者中,分配给BEP的患者中有268名中的253名(94.4%)达到了完全缓解,而分配给CEB的260名中有227名(87.3%)(P = .009)。分配给BEP的300例患者中有30例治疗失败,分配给CEB的298例中有79例(对数秩2 = 26.9; P <.001),导致1年无失败率达到91%(95)。 %置信区间[CI]为88%至94%)和77%(95%CI为72%至82%)。分配给BEP的患者中有10例死亡,分配给CEB的患者中有27例死亡(log-rank chi 2 = 8.77; P = .003),导致3年生存率达97%(95%CI,95%CI)。 99%)和90%(95%CI,86%至94%)。结论:在这些药物剂量和时间表下,基于卡铂的联合化疗不如基于顺铂的联合化疗。包含中等剂量的依托泊苷和博来霉素的这种BEP方案可有效治疗转移性非精原细胞瘤的预后良好的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号