...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computational Chemistry: Organic, Inorganic, Physical, Biological >Comparison of the Accuracy of Periodic Reaction Field Methods in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Model Liquid Crystal System
【24h】

Comparison of the Accuracy of Periodic Reaction Field Methods in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Model Liquid Crystal System

机译:模型液晶系统分子动力学模拟中周期反应场方法精度的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A periodic reaction field (PRF) method is a technique to estimate long-range interactions. The method has the potential to effectively reduce the computational cost while maintaining adequate accuracy. We performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of a model liquid-crystal system to assess the accuracy of some variations of the PRF method in low-charge density systems. All the methods had adequate accuracy compared with the results of the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method, except for a few simulation conditions. Furthermore, in all of the simulation conditions, one of the PRF methods had the same accuracy as the PME method. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
机译:周期性反应场(PRF)方法是一种估计远程相互作用的技术。该方法具有在保持足够的准确性的同时有效降低计算成本的潜力。我们对液晶模型系统进行了分子动力学(MD)模拟,以评估低电荷密度系统中PRF方法某些变化的准确性。除了一些模拟条件外,所有方法与粒子网格Ewald(PME)方法的结果相比都具有足够的精度。此外,在所有模拟条件下,其中一种PRF方法具有与PME方法相同的精度。 (C)2015年Wiley Periodicals,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号