...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical nursing >'If it is not recorded, it has not been done!'? consistency between nursing records and observed nursing care in an Italian hospital.
【24h】

'If it is not recorded, it has not been done!'? consistency between nursing records and observed nursing care in an Italian hospital.

机译:“如果未记录,则尚未完成!”?意大利医院的护理记录与观察到的护理之间的一致性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the consistency between the care given to patients and that documented, by comparing care observations with nursing records and describing which interventions were reported and which were omitted. BACKGROUND: Assumptions have been made about the relationship between documentation and care actually delivered, but there is insufficient evidence on the relationship between the actual care given and its recording. DESIGN: Observational study of the care given, completed by interviews and retrospective survey of records. METHODS: Structured observation during day shifts in the first six days of admission of pre and postsurgical care provided to 21 consecutive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and audit of their nursing records. Each observation was completed by short interviews to nurses to ensure observations validity. RESULTS: Only 40% of nursing activities observed were included in the nursing records (37% of the assessments and 45% of the interventions). This indicated that nurses carry out more activities than they report. Consistency between performed and recorded care decreased significantly during the days when a higher number of activities were performed. Consistency between recording and observation of assessment activities was 38% for physical needs and 0% for educational needs. Consistency was higher for the assessments of physical signs/symptoms and risk factors for complications compared to the assessment of basic needs and pain. Consistency was 47% for technical interventions and 3% for educational activities. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing records were not found to be an adequate tool for quality care evaluation, because they did not include all the caring activities that the nurses had carried out. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study supports the need to identify documentation systems that are easy to complete. Moreover, nursing education should pay more attention to the competences in the field of holistic care and patient education.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过将护理观察结果与护理记录进行比较,并描述报告了哪些干预措施和哪些措施被省略,从而评估了为患者提供的护理和所记录的护理之间的一致性。背景:已经对文件和实际提供的护理之间的关系进行了假设,但没有足够的证据证明所提供的实际护理与其记录之间的关系。设计:对所提供护理的观察性研究,通过访谈和对记录的回顾性调查来完成。方法:在连续21例接受大腹部手术的患者接受手术前和术后护理的六天内,每天轮班期间进行结构化观察,并对其护理记录进行审核。每个观察都是通过对护士的简短访谈来完成的,以确保观察的有效性。结果:观察到的护理活动中只有40%被包括在护理记录中(37%的评估和45%的干预措施)。这表明护士进行的活动比他们报告的要多。当执行更多活动时,执行和记录的护理之间的一致性显着下降。记录和观察评估活动之间的一致性是,身体需要38%,教育需要0%。与基本需求和疼痛的评估相比,身体体征/症状和并发症的危险因素评估的一致性更高。技术干预的一致性为47%,教育活动的一致性为3%。结论:护理记录并未被认为是进行质量护理评估的适当工具,因为它们没有包括护士进行的所有护理活动。与临床实践的关系:这项研究支持确定易于完成的文献系统的需求。此外,护理教育应更加重视整体护理和患者教育领域的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号