首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chromatography, Biomedical Applications >Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry coupling versus micro-high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry coupling: a case study
【24h】

Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry coupling versus micro-high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry coupling: a case study

机译:毛细管电泳质谱联用与微型高效液相色谱质谱联用:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and micro-high-performance liquid chromatography (mu-HPLC) coupled to electrospray ionisation (ESI) mass spectrometry were compared with respect to their applicability to problems arising in pharmaceutical drug research and development. Both techniques, which are similar with regard to their operational parameters, were coupled to an API III plus triple quadrupole mass spectrometer using laboratory-built interfaces. The results achieved with the two combinations were compared for sensitivity and general applicability to the quantitative analysis of pharmaceuticals in biological fluids. Midazolam, the 8-chloro-6-(2-fluoro-phenyl)-1-methyl-4H-imidazo-[1,5]-a[1,4]-benzodiazepi ne, and three of its metabolites were used as test compounds, either as standard solution or after sample clean-up from human plasma. Following different sample preparation routes, Liquid-Liquid extraction or solid-phase extraction, differences in detection limits as well as robustness in CZE or mu-HPLC coupled with ion spray mass spectrometry (IS-MS) were investigated. Detection limits of about 500 pg/ml for the drug and 2 ng/ml for the metabolites were achieved, using 1 ml of human plasma, only when liquid-liquid extraction was used for sample preparation. Sample preparation using the simpler and faster solid-phase extraction route resulted in deterioration of the separation or clogging of the columns. In all cases, when standard solutions or sample extracts were used, CZE-ESI-MS provided both different selectivity and greater sensitivity. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. [References: 28]
机译:比较了毛细管区带电泳(CZE)和微高效液相色谱(mu-HPLC)结合电喷雾电离(ESI)质谱的适用性,探讨了它们在药物研发中所遇到问题的适用性。两种技术的操作参数相似,均使用实验室建立的接口与API III加三重四极杆质谱仪耦合。比较了两种组合所获得的结果的敏感性和对生物流体中药物定量分析的一般适用性。使用咪达唑仑,8-氯-6-(2-氟-苯基)-1-甲基-4H-咪唑-[1,5] -a [1,4]-苯并二氮杂ne及其三种代谢物作为试验标准溶液或从人血浆中纯化样品后的化合物。按照不同的样品制备路线,液-液萃取或固相萃取,检测限的差异以及CZE或mu-HPLC与离子喷雾质谱(IS-MS)的耐用性进行了研究。仅当使用液-液萃取进行样品制备时,使用1 ml人血浆才能达到药物的检出限为约500 pg / ml,代谢物的检出限为2 ng / ml。使用更简单,更快速的固相萃取路线进行样品制备会导致色谱柱分离或堵塞的情况恶化。在所有情况下,当使用标准溶液或样品提取物时,CZE-ESI-MS都提供了不同的选择性和更高的灵敏度。 (C)1998 Elsevier Science B.V.保留所有权利。 [参考:28]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号