首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Biochemistry >Effectiveness and limitations of resolving HLA class I and class II by heterozygous ambiguity resolving primers (HARPs)-a modified technique of sequence-based typing (SBT)
【24h】

Effectiveness and limitations of resolving HLA class I and class II by heterozygous ambiguity resolving primers (HARPs)-a modified technique of sequence-based typing (SBT)

机译:杂合歧义解析引物(HARP)解决HLA I类和II类的有效性和局限性-一种基于序列分型(SBT)的改良技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the use of combination of SBT (sequence based typing) and HARP (heterozygous ambiguity resolving primer) in HLA typing to acquire high resolution typing results. Design and methods: 167 DNA samples were analyzed by SBT. The web site HARPs Finder provided by Conexio Genomics, the developer of HARPs (http://www.harpsfinder.conexio-genomics.com/index.html) was then used to search for appropriate HARPs. Results: HARPs can resolve 95% of ambiguities for locus A; 86% for B and 60% for DRB1 locus. However, there are still limitations. Practically PCR products of un-separated alleles are used as templates for sequencing by HARP; sometimes, it is still impossible to get unambiguous typing. Conclusions: We outlined the advantages and disadvantages of SBT/HARP. A list of HARPs for choice to resolve ambiguity of SBT in Taiwanese population is concluded.
机译:目的:目的是评估SBT(基于序列的分型)和HARP(杂合歧义歧义解析引物)在HLA分型中的结合使用,以获取高分辨率分型结果。设计和方法:通过SBT分析了167个DNA样品。然后,使用由HARP开发者Conexio Genomics提供的网站HARP Finder(http://www.harpsfinder.conexio-genomics.com/index.html)搜索适当的HARP。结果:HARPs可以解决95%的基因座A歧义; B为86%,DRB1为60%。但是,仍然存在限制。实际上,未分离等位基因的PCR产物被用作HARP测序的模板。有时,仍然不可能获得明确的输入。结论:我们概述了SBT / HARP的优缺点。总结了用于解决台湾人群中SBT歧义的HARP列表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号