...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Climate >Comments on 'Global and Regional Comparison of Daily 2-m and 1000-hPa Maximum and Minimum Temperatures in Three Global Reanalyses'
【24h】

Comments on 'Global and Regional Comparison of Daily 2-m and 1000-hPa Maximum and Minimum Temperatures in Three Global Reanalyses'

机译:评论“在三项全球再分析中每日2 m和1000-hPa最高和最低温度的全球和区域比较”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pitman and Perkins claimed that instantaneous 2-m air temperatures from different reanalysis products largely disagree over widespread regions of the globe and that, because of their much smaller differences, temperatures at 1000 hPa should be preferably used. This comment shows that this claim is based on erroneous results.
机译:Pitman和Perkins声称,来自全球不同地区的不同再分析产品造成的瞬时2 m空气温度差异很大,并且由于它们之间的差异小得多,因此应优选使用1000 hPa的温度。该评论表明,该主张是基于错误的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号