首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chemical Education >Five Things Chemists (and Other Science Faculty) Should Know about the Education Research Literature
【24h】

Five Things Chemists (and Other Science Faculty) Should Know about the Education Research Literature

机译:化学家(和其他理学院)应了解的五件事关于教育研究文献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Faculty are increasingly expected to provide a more student-centered learning experience in their classes, including in large introductory courses. To do this, they may choose from a colorful palette of active learning approaches and tools that have been piloted in a wide variety of settings. Success, however, depends on more than the knowledge of what works and a commitment to implementing it. It requires a deep understanding of the principles of learning that underlie the approach or tool, which in turn requires fluency with the education research literature. While the literature is replete with implications for practice, much of it is written for education researchers rather than for science instructors. This brief commentary aims to help chemists and other faculty efficiently sift through this enormous body of work and glean insights about teaching and learning to improve their practice.
机译:人们日益期望教师在课堂上,包括在大型入门课程中,提供以学生为中心的学习体验。为此,他们可以从丰富多彩的主动学习方法和工具中进行选择,这些方法和工具已经在各种环境中进行了试验。然而,成功不仅仅取决于对什么有效的知识以及对实现它的承诺。它要求对作为方法或工具基础的学习原理有深刻的理解,而这又需要流利的教育研究文献。尽管文献中充斥着对实践的启示,但其中许多是为教育研究人员而不是为科学指导教师编写的。这篇简短的评论旨在帮助化学家和其他教职员工有效地筛查这项庞大的工作,并收集有关教学和改进实践的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号