...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laser medicine and surgery >Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities.
【24h】

Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities.

机译:使用Er:YAG激光,空气磨蚀或空气涡轮机制备空腔对复合材料与牙本质的拉伸粘合强度影响的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the tensile bond strength of the Single Bond (3M) adhesive system placed over dentin surfaces treated with air turbine, Er:YAG laser without contact and in focused or air abrasion. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of dentin adhesives is a well-established clinical routine among the dentists. However, there have been few reports comparing the influence of the Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, and air turbine on the Single Bond tensile bond strength of adhesives systems to dentin fact that could influence which tools dentists select for use in cavity preparations. METHODS: Twenty-three extracted retained human molars were used in this study. The coronal portion was divided in two parts and fixed in acrylic resin; the occlusal surface was abraded to a 2-mm width with a mechanic lathe until the dentin surface was completely exposed. The dental portions were divided into three groups of 15 each and treated with Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine. A 3 mm hole in the center of each tooth was marked off using contact paper. Single Bond (3M) adhesive system was applied after acid phosphoric at 35% application for 15 sec over dentin surfaces. A resin composite cone was built into the delimited area to accomplish the tensile bond strength test on the EMIC universal test machine. The specimens were then evaluated by stereoscopy to determine the type of failures into the dentin-adhesive-resin composite surface. RESULTS: The tensile test was performed using the universal testing machine EMIC DL-2000 at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The average results were: air turbine (17.52 MPa), Er:YAG laser (16.65 MPa) and air abrasion (15.83 MPa). Statistical treatment by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.01) showed no significant differences between the groups tested. The tensile bond strength test to the dentin showed no significant difference among the three groups when the Single Bond was used after the 35% phosphoric-acid conditioning. The stereoscopy showed a predominant adhesive failure in all groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that Single Bond tensile bond strength is the same as dentin prepared by Er:YAG laser, air abrasion, or air turbine.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是在体外评估单键(3M)粘合剂体系的拉伸粘合强度,该体系置于空气涡轮,Er:YAG激光未接触且聚焦或空气磨损的牙本质表面上。发明背景数据:牙本质粘合剂的使用是牙医中公认的临床常规。但是,很少有报道将Er:YAG激光,空气磨蚀和空气涡轮对胶粘剂系统的单键拉伸粘合强度的影响与牙本质的事实进行比较,这些事实可能会影响牙医选择在腔体准备中使用的工具。方法:本研究使用二十三个提取的保留的人类磨牙。将冠状部分分成两部分,并固定在丙烯酸树脂中。用机械车床将牙合面磨蚀至2毫米宽,直到牙本质面完全暴露。将牙齿部分分成三组,每组15个,并用Er:YAG激光,空气磨蚀或空气涡轮机处理。使用接触纸在每个牙齿的中央划一个3毫米的孔。在牙本质表面以35%的比例施加酸性磷酸15秒钟后,施加单键(3M)粘合剂体系。在限定区域中内置了树脂复合材料锥体,以在EMIC万能试验机上完成拉伸粘结强度试验。然后通过立体镜检查评估标本,以确定牙本质-粘合剂-树脂复合材料表面破坏的类型。结果:使用万能试验机EMIC DL-2000以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度进行了拉伸试验。平均结果为:空气涡轮机(17.52 MPa),Er:YAG激光(16.65 MPa)和空气磨损(15.83 MPa)。通过ANOVA和Tukey检验进行的统计学处理(p <0.01)显示,受试组之间无显着差异。当在35%的磷酸条件下使用单键时,对牙本质的拉伸粘合强度测试显示三组之间没有显着差异。立体镜显示在所有组中主要的粘合失败。结论:这些结果表明,单键拉伸粘合强度与Er:YAG激光,空气磨蚀或空气涡轮机制备的牙本质相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号