首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States
【24h】

Benchmarking Coupled Cluster Methods on Valence Singlet Excited States

机译:对价单重态激发态的耦合聚类方法进行基准测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, benchmark results are presented or Coupled Cluster calculation of singlet excitation energies and tht corresponding oscillator strength. The test set of Thiel et al. (Schreiber M.; Silva, M. R. J.; Sauer, S. P. A; Thiel, W. /. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128 134110) has been used, and the earlier results have been extended b) CC3 oscillator strength for the whole set, CC3 excitation energies foi larger molecules, and CCSDT results for some small molecules Accuracy of the members of the hierarchy CC2-CCSD-CC3-CCSD1 has been analyzed. The results show that both CC2 and CCSD are quite accurate and the difference to CC3 excitations energies i; typically not larger than 0.2—0.3 eV. While the mean deviation of the CC2 results is close to zero, CCSD systematically overshoots the CC3 results by about 0.2 eV. The standard deviation is, however, somewhal smaller for CCSD, that is, the latter method provides more systematic results. Still, only a few cases could be identified were the absolute value of the error is over 0.3 eV in case of CC2. The results are even better for CCSD, with the exception of uracil, where surprisingly large error of the excitation energies have been found for two of the four lowest n—n transitions. Both LR (Linear Response) and EOM (Equation of Motion) style oscillator strengths have been calculated. The former is more accurate at both CC2 and CCSD levels, but the difference between them is only 1-2% in case of CCSD. The error of the CC2 oscillator strength are substantially larger than that of CCSD but qualitatively still correct.
机译:在本文中,给出了基准结果或单重态激发能和相应振荡器强度的耦合聚类计算。 Thiel等人的测试集。 (Schreiber M .; Silva,MRJ; Sauer,SP A; Thiel,W. /。Chem。Phys。2008,128 134110),并且已经扩展了较早的结果b)整个装置的CC3振荡器强度, CC3激发能量产生大分子,一些小分子的CCSDT结果分析了CC2-CCSD-CC3-CCSD1层次成员的准确性。结果表明,CC2和CCSD都非常准确,与CC3激发能量的差i;通常不大于0.2-0.3 eV。 CC2结果的平均偏差接近于零,而CCSD系统地将CC3结果超调了约0.2 eV。但是,对于CCSD,标准偏差要小一些,也就是说,后一种方法可以提供更系统的结果。尽管如此,在CC2的情况下,仅能确定出误差的绝对值超过0.3 eV的情况很少。除尿嘧啶外,结果对于CCSD甚至更好,在四个最低n-n跃迁中的两个跃迁中发现了惊人的激发能量误差。 LR(线性响应)和EOM(运动方程)风格的振荡器强度均已计算。前者在CC2和CCSD级别上都更准确,但在CCSD情况下,两者之间的差异仅为1-2%。 CC2振荡器强度的误差明显大于CCSD的误差,但从质量上来说仍然正确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号