...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Anharmonic Vibrational Frequency Calculations Are Not Worthwhile for Small Basis Sets
【24h】

Anharmonic Vibrational Frequency Calculations Are Not Worthwhile for Small Basis Sets

机译:小基数集的非谐振动频率计算不值得

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anharmonic calculations using vibrational perturbation theory are known to provide near-spectroscopic accuracy when combined with high-level ab initio potential energy functions. However, performance with economical, popular electronic structure methods is less well characterized. We compare the accuracy of harmonic and anharmonic predictions from Hartree— Fock, second-order perturbation, and density functional theories combined with 6-31G(d) and 6-31+G(d,p) basis sets. As expected, anharmonic frequencies are closer than harmonic frequencies to experimental fundamentals. However, common practice is to correct harmonic predictions using multiplicative scaling. The surprising conclusion is that scaled anharmonic calculations are no more accurate than scaled harmonic calculations for the basis sets we used. The data used are from the Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB), maintained by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which includes more than 3939 independent vibrations for 3S8 molecules.
机译:当与高级从头算起势能函数结合使用时,使用振动摄动理论的非谐计算可以提供近光谱精度。但是,使用经济,流行的电子结构方法的性能不太好表征。我们比较了Hartree-Fock,二阶扰动和密度泛函理论结合6-31G(d)和6-31 + G(d,p)基集的谐波和非谐预测的准确性。不出所料,非谐波频率比谐波频率更接近实验基础。但是,通常的做法是使用乘法缩放来校正谐波预测。令人惊讶的结论是,对于我们使用的基集,按比例缩放的非谐波计算并不比按比例缩放的谐波计算更准确。使用的数据来自美国国家标准技术研究院维护的计算化学比较和基准数据库(CCCBDB),其中包括3S8分子的3939多个独立振动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号