首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Electron Attachment to Diselenides Revisited: Se-Se Bond Cleavage Is Neither Adiabatic nor the Most Favorable Process
【24h】

Electron Attachment to Diselenides Revisited: Se-Se Bond Cleavage Is Neither Adiabatic nor the Most Favorable Process

机译:电子对二硒化物的再研究:硒-硒键裂解既不是绝热也不是最有利的过程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Up to now it has been generally assumed that the electron capture on diselenides XSeSeX' produces a fragmentation of the Se—Se bond. However, our high-level ab initio calculations indicate that this is the case only when the substituents X and X' attached to the diselenide bridge have low electronegativity. Also importantly, even when the two substituents are of similar electronegativity, the Se—Se bond cleavage rarely is an adiabatic process. For low-electronegative X substituents, the extra electron is placed in the σ(Se—Se) antibonding orbital, and the cleavage of the Se—Se bond is the most favorable process. However, the mechanism of this bond breaking is more intricate than previously assumed, and for asymmetric derivatives it proceeds through a conical intersection (CI). These findings emphasize the importance of using accurate ab initio calculations, rather than the usually employed density functional theory approaches, when dealing with reactions in biochemistry and organometallic chemistry, because the characterization of a CI requires the use of multireference methods to account for the mixing of states. When X is highly electronegative, the σ*(Se—X) antibonding orbital becomes highly stabilized with respect to the σ*(Se—Se) strongly favoring the cleavage of the Se-X bond, whereas the Se—Se remains practically unperturbed. Finally, when comparing the present results on diselenides with those of the disulfide analogues, it is apparent that the activation barriers and the final products of the different imimolecular reactions are higher in energy for the diselenides, in spite of the higher antioxidant strength of diselenides. This seems to indicate that the electron detachment process, less favorable for diselenides than for disulfides, competes with the electron-capture dissociation process and therefore should also be considered to explain the different antioxidant ability of these compounds.
机译:到目前为止,一般认为二硒化物XSeSeX'上的电子捕获会产生Se-Se键的断裂。然而,我们的高级从头算计算表明,仅当与二硒化物桥连接的取代基X和X'具有低电负性时,情况才如此。同样重要的是,即使两个取代基具有相似的电负性,Se-Se键断裂也很少是绝热过程。对于低电负性X取代基,多余的电子位于σ(Se-Se)反键轨道中,Se-Se键的裂解是最有利的过程。但是,这种键断裂的机制比以前假定的要复杂得多,对于不对称导数,它会通过圆锥形交叉点(CI)进行。这些发现强调了在处理生物化学和有机金属化学中的反应时,使用准确的从头算的重要性,而不是通常采用的密度泛函理论方法,因为CI的表征需要使用多参考方法来解决混合物的混合问题。状态。当X具有高负电性时,相对于σ*(Se-Se),σ*(Se-X)反键轨道变得高度稳定,从而强烈地促进了Se-X键的裂解,而Se-Se实际上几乎不受干扰。最后,当将目前在二硒化物上的结果与二硫化物类似物的结果进行比较时,很明显,尽管二硒化物的抗氧化强度较高,但不同的亚分子反应的活化势垒和终产物的能量较高。这似乎表明,电子分离过程比二硫化物更不适合二硒化物,与电子捕获解离过程竞争,因此也应考虑解释这些化合物的不同抗氧化能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号