首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Characterizing dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in pediatric patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.
【24h】

Characterizing dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in pediatric patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

机译:表征小儿房室结折返性心动过速的双房室结生理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology, defined as an AH jump > or =50 msec with a 10 msec decrease in A1A2, is the substrate for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and yet it is present in a minority of pediatric patients with AVNRT. Our objective was to characterize dual AV nodal physiology as it pertains to a pediatric population. METHODS/RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed invasive electrophysiology studies in 92 patients with AVNRT (age12.1 +/- 3.7 yrs) and in 46 controls without AVNRT (age 13.3 +/- 3.7 yrs). Diagnoses in controls: syncope (N = 31), palpitations (N = 6), atrial flutter (N = 3), history of atrial tachycardia with no inducible arrhythmia (N = 3), and ventricular tachycardia (N = 3). General anesthesia was used in 49% of AVNRT and 52% of controls, P = 0.86. There were no differences in PR, AH, HV, or AV block cycle length. With A1A2 atrial stimulation, AVNRT patients had a significantly longer maximum AH achieved (324 +/- 104 msec vs 255 +/- 67 msec, P = 0.001), and a shorter AVNERP (276 +/- 49 msec vs 313 +/- 68 msec P = 0.0005). An AH jump > or =50 msec was found in 42% of AVNRT versus 30% of controls (P = 0.2). Using a ROC graph we found that an AH jump of any size is a poor predictor of AVNRT. With atrial overdrive pacing, PR > or = RR was seen more commonly in AVNRT versus controls, (55/91(60%) vs 6/46 (13%) P = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Neither the common definition of dual AV nodes or redefining an AH jump as some value <50 msec are reliable methods to define dual AV nodes or to predict AVNRT in pediatric patients. PR > or = RR is a relatively good predictor of AVNRT.
机译:简介:房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)的基础是双重房室(AV)淋巴结生理学,定义为AH跳跃>或= 50毫秒且A1A2降低10毫秒,但它存在于房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)中使用AVNRT。我们的目标是表征与儿童人群有关的双重AV结生理。方法/结果:我们回顾性研究了92例AVNRT患者(12.1 +/- 3.7岁)和46例无AVNRT患者(13.3 +/- 3.7岁)的侵入性电生理研究。对照诊断:晕厥(N = 31),心(N = 6),房扑(N = 3),无诱发性心律失常的房性心动过速史(N = 3)和室性心动过速(N = 3)。 49%的AVNRT和52%的对照使用全麻,P = 0.86。 PR,AH,HV或AV块周期长度没有差异。通过A1A2心房刺激,AVNRT患者获得的最大AH明显更长(324 +/- 104毫秒vs 255 +/- 67毫秒,P = 0.001),而AVNERP较短(276 +/- 49毫秒vs 313 +/-)。 68毫秒P = 0.0005)。在42%的AVNRT与30%的对照中,发现AH跳大于或等于50毫秒(P = 0.2)。使用ROC图,我们发现任何大小的AH跳变都无法很好地预测AVNRT。心房超速起搏时,AVNRT与对照组相比,PR>或= RR更常见(55/91(60%)对6/46(13%),P = 0.000)。结论:双房室结的一般定义或重新定义AH跳跃都不是因为某些值<50毫秒是定义双房室结或预测小儿患者AVNRT的可靠方法。 PR>或= RR是AVNRT的相对较好的预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号