...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Early recurrences are not always benign after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Do we need to reassess the need for a blanking period?
【24h】

Early recurrences are not always benign after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Do we need to reassess the need for a blanking period?

机译:导管消融心房颤动后,早期复发并不总是良性的:我们是否需要重新评估消隐期的需要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Radiofrequency catheter ablation has become a well-accepted management strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, failure is not uncommon and only two-thirds or less of the patients are free of atrial fibrillation on long-term follow-up.1-2 It has been recognized that early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT), usually defined as arrhythmia recurrence in the first 3 months following ablation, may not always predict recurrent arrhythmia later, although retrospective studies have shown that ERAT is frequently associated with late recurrence (LR) of atrial tachyarrhythmia.3'4 In a study published in this issue of the Journal, Andrade et al. have addressed the question of the relationship of early and late recurrence in a prospectively designed study.5
机译:射频导管消融已成为心房纤颤(AF)的公认管理策略。但是,失败并不罕见,长期随访中只有三分之二或更少的患者没有房颤。1-2人们已经认识到房性心律失常(ERAT)的早期复发,通常被定义为心律不齐消融后头3个月的复发可能并不总是能预测复发性心律失常,尽管回顾性研究表明ERAT经常与房速性心律失常的晚期复发(LR)相关。3'4在本期《杂志》上发表的一项研究中,Andrade等。在一项前瞻性设计研究中解决了早期和晚期复发之间的关系问题5。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号