...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Reader- and instrument-dependent variability in the electrocardiographic assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.
【24h】

Reader- and instrument-dependent variability in the electrocardiographic assessment of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.

机译:心律失常性右室发育异常/心肌病的心电图评估中读者和仪器相关的变异性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of standardized definitions, widely varying prevalence estimates of electrocardiographic (ECG) features related to arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) have been reported in different cohorts. This study was aimed at examining the variability in the ECG interpretation resulting from the same reader, different readers, and using different ECG-resolutions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blinded to other clinical data, 2 readers examined quantitative and qualitative ECG features of 20 (10 ARVD/C) randomly selected individuals. ECGs were recorded at standard-speed (SS) and double-speed-double-amplitude (DS) settings. The SS ECGs were scanned, magnified 4x, and evaluated using electronic calipers (EL). One reader repeated all measurements. For both readers, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the measurement of QRS duration was good between conventional and electronic evaluation [DS vs EL: Reader 1--0.64 (0.52-0.73); Reader 2--0.67 (0.55-0.76)][SS vs EL: Reader 1--0.60 (0.47-0.70); Reader 2--0.60 (0.47-0.70)]. Using the same resolution, the intrareader ICC was good for SS [0.70 (0.59-0.78)], DS [0.85 (0.80-0.90)], and EL [0.70 (0.69-0.83)] resolutions, but deteriorated for interreader comparisons [0.50 (0.36-0.62), 0.75 (0.66-0.82), and 0.75 (0.66-0.82), respectively]. For qualitative parameters, the intra- and interreader agreement was inconsistent for all but 2 parameters. Both readers were in perfect agreement while interpreting right precordial T-wave inversion [kappa= 1] and right bundle branch block morphology (RBBB) [kappa= 0.83 (0.5-1.0)] even when using SS resolution. CONCLUSIONS: Right precordial t-wave inversion and RBBB are the only ECG parameters that can be detected consistently even using the conventionally used ECG-resolution. The substantial variability in evaluation of other parameters is not improved even with the use of higher resolutions.
机译:简介:尽管使用了标准化的定义,但在不同的队列研究中,与心律失常性右室发育不良/心肌病(ARVD / C)相关的心电图(ECG)功能的患病率估计值存在很大差异。这项研究旨在检查由同一读者,不同读者以及使用不同ECG分辨率导致的ECG解释的差异。方法和结果:2位读者对其他临床数据不了解,他们检查了随机选择的20个人(10 ARVD / C)的定量和定性ECG特征。心电图以标准速度(SS)和双速双振幅(DS)设置记录。扫描SS ECG,放大4倍,并使用电子卡尺(EL)进行评估。一位读者重复了所有测量。对于两种阅读器,在常规评估和电子评估之间,用于测量QRS持续时间的组内相关系数(ICC)都很好[DS vs EL:阅读器1-0.64(0.52-0.73);读取器2--0.67(0.55-0.76)] [SS与EL:读取器1--0.60(0.47-0.70);读取器2--0.60(0.47-0.70)]。使用相同的分辨率,读卡器内部的ICC对SS [0.70(0.59-0.78)],DS [0.85(0.80-0.90)]和EL [0.70(0.69-0.83)]分辨率均有效,但对于阅读器间的比较[0.50]却有所下降(0.36-0.62),0.75(0.66-0.82)和0.75(0.66-0.82)]。对于定性参数,除2个参数外,阅读器内部和阅读器之间的协议不一致。即使使用SS分辨率,在解释右胸前T波反演[kappa = 1]和右束支传导阻滞形态(RBBB)[kappa = 0.83(0.5-1.0)]时,两个读者也完全同意。结论:即使使用常规的心电图分辨率,右前胸t波反演和RBBB是唯一可以一致检测到的心电图参数。即使使用更高的分辨率,也无法改善其他参数评估中的实质差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号