首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography >Oversizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a commonly used term but a poorly understood one: Dependency on definition and geometrical measurements
【24h】

Oversizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a commonly used term but a poorly understood one: Dependency on definition and geometrical measurements

机译:经导管主动脉瓣置换术中尺寸过大,这是一个常用术语,但人们对其了解甚少:对定义和几何测量的依赖性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In transcatheter aortic valve replacement, prosthesis oversizing is essential to prevent paravalvular regurgitation. However, the estimated extent of oversizing strongly depends on the measurement used for annular sizing. Purpose: The aim was to investigate the influence of geometrical parameters for calculation of relative oversizing in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, reported as percentage in relation to the native annulus size, to standardize reporting. Methods: Electrocardiogram-gated cardiac dual-source CT data of 130 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean age, 81 ± 8years; 56 men; mean aortic valve area, 0.67 ± 0.18 cm2) were included. Aortic annulus dimensions were quantified by means ofplanimetry that yielded area and perimeter at the level of the basal attachment points ofthe aortic cusps during systole. Area- and perimeter-derived diameters were calculatedas DA= 2× √(A/π) and DP= P/π. Hypothetical prosthesis sizing was based on DA (23-mm prosthesis for 19-22mm; 26-mm prosthesis for 22-25mm; 29-mm prosthesis for 25-28mm). Relative oversizing for hypothetical prosthesis selection was calculated as percentage in relation to the native annulus size. Results: Mean annulus area was 492.12 ± 94.9mm2 and mean perimeter was 80.1 ± 7.6mm. DP was significantly larger than DA (25.5 ± 2.4mm vs 24.9 ± 2.4mm; P .001). Mean maximum diameter was 28.1 ± 3.0mm and mean minimal diameter was 22.8 ± 2.4mm. Calculated eccentricity index [EI= 1- minimal diameter/maximum diameter)] was 0.19 ± 0.06. Difference between DP and DA correlated significantly with EI (r= 0.67; P .001). Relative oversizing was 10.2% ± 3.8% and 21.6% ± 8.4% by DA and area, and 7.8% ± 3.9% by both DP and perimeter. Conclusion: For planimetric assessment of aortic annulus dimensions with CT, the percentage oversizing calculated strongly depends on the geometrical variable used for quantifying annular dimensions. Standardized nomenclature seems warranted for comparison of future studies.
机译:背景:在经导管主动脉瓣置换术中,假体尺寸过大对于防止瓣周关闭不全至关重要。但是,估计的过大尺寸在很大程度上取决于用于环形定型的尺寸。目的:目的是研究几何参数对经导管主动脉瓣置换术中相对过大尺寸的计算的影响,以相对于自然瓣环大小的百分比报告,以标准化报告。方法:纳入130例连续的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者(平均年龄81±8岁; 56名男性;平均主动脉瓣面积0.67±0.18 cm2)的心电门控心脏双源CT数据。主动脉瓣环的尺寸通过平面测量法进行量化,该平面测量法在收缩期产生主动脉瓣基部附着点水平的面积和周长。得出的面积和周长直径为DA = 2×√(A /π)和DP = P /π。假设假体的大小基于DA(19--22mm的23mm假体; 22-25mm的26mm假体; 25-28mm的29mm假体)。假设假体选择的相对尺寸偏大是相对于自然环尺寸的百分比。结果:平均环面面积为492.12±94.9mm2,平均周长为80.1±7.6mm。 DP显着大于DA(25.5±2.4mm vs 24.9±2.4mm; P <.001)。平均最大直径为28.1±3.0mm,平均最小直径为22.8±2.4mm。计算的偏心指数[EI = 1-最小直径/最大直径]为0.19±0.06。 DP和DA之间的差异与EI显着相关(r = 0.67; P <.001)。 DA和面积的相对尺寸过大为10.2%±3.8%和21.6%±8.4%,DP和周长相对为7.8%±3.9%。结论:对于用CT进行主动脉瓣环尺寸的平面评估,计算出的过大尺寸百分比很大程度上取决于用于量化环形尺寸的几何变量。标准化的命名法似乎有必要用于将来的研究比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号