首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia >Evaluation of a new platelet function analyzer in cardiac surgery: a comparison of modified thromboelastography and whole-blood aggregometry.
【24h】

Evaluation of a new platelet function analyzer in cardiac surgery: a comparison of modified thromboelastography and whole-blood aggregometry.

机译:心脏手术中新型血小板功能分析仪的评估:改良血栓弹力描记术与全血凝集测定法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Impaired hemostasis of multiple etiologies are often present in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. Platelet dysfunction is considered to be important in the early postoperative period. Therefore, a new whole-blood platelet function analyzer was compared with thromboelastography in predicting postoperative hemostatic outcomes as measured by blood loss and blood product use. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled 54 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: Coagulation and platelet function were assessed preoperatively, after CPB, at 3 hours, and at 24 hours after surgery by using thromboelastography and impedance aggregometry. Patients were divided into a transfused and nontransfused group on the basis of postoperative transfusion requirements. Postoperative blood loss and requirements of blood transfusions were documented until 24 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Twenty-five patients (46%) received postoperative blood transfusions. Impaired hemostasis occurred after CPB detected by thromboelastography (p < 0.01) and impedance aggregometry (p < 0.01). In contrast to thromboelastography, preoperative adenosine diphosphate-mediated aggregometry correlated with postoperative requirements for blood transfusion (Spearman r = -0.302, p < 0.05) and was significantly lower in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with nontransfused patients (p < 0.05). Neither aggregometry nor thromboelastography was correlated with postoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: Impedance aggregometry as well as thromboelastography are able to detect impaired hemostasis after CPB. In contrast to thromboelastography, aggregometry using a new whole-blood aggregometer identified patients with a reduced risk for postoperative transfusion requirements.
机译:目的:进行心肺分流术(CPB)的患者经常会出现多种病因的止血功能受损。血小板功能障碍被认为在术后早期很重要。因此,将新的全血血小板功能分析仪与血栓弹力描记术进行了比较,以预测术后的止血结果(通过失血量和血液制品的使用来衡量)。设计:前瞻性研究。地点:教学医院。参与者:该研究招募了54名计划进行CPB冠状动脉搭桥手术的患者。干预措施:术前,CPB后,手术后3小时和手术24小时使用血栓弹力图和阻抗凝集法评估凝血和血小板功能。根据术后输血要求将患者分为输血组和非输血组。记录了术后失血量和输血量,直到术后24小时。测量和主要结果:25例患者(46%)接受了术后输血。血栓弹力图(p <0.01)和阻抗凝集法(p <0.01)检测到CPB后,止血功能受损。与血栓弹力造影相反,术前二磷酸腺苷介导的凝集测定与术后输血需求相关(Spearman r = -0.302,p <0.05),同种异体输血患者与非输血患者相比明显更低(p <0.05)。凝集术和血栓弹力图都与术后失血无关。结论:阻抗凝集术和血栓弹力描记术能够检测出CPB后受损的止血。与血栓弹力描记术相反,使用新型全血凝集仪的凝集测定法可确定术后输血风险降低的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号