...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiology >Comparison of early outcomes after primary stenting in Japanese patients with acute myocardial infarction between clopidogrel and ticlopidine in concomitant use with proton-pump inhibitor
【24h】

Comparison of early outcomes after primary stenting in Japanese patients with acute myocardial infarction between clopidogrel and ticlopidine in concomitant use with proton-pump inhibitor

机译:日本急性心肌梗死患者初次置入支架后氯吡格雷和噻氯匹定与质子泵抑制剂同时使用的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recent studies have reported that concomitant use of clopidogrel with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) might decrease antiplatelet effects and increase the risk of adverse outcomes after coronary stenting. However, little is known about the difference between clopidogrel and ticlopidine in concomitant use with PPIs, especially within the Asian population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 302 consecutive patients (248 males, mean age 66. ± 12 years) undergoing primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction from July 2006 to June 2010. PPIs were administered to 92% (278/302) of the patients. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of clopidogrel (clopidogrel group, n= 187) or ticlopidine (ticlopidine group, n= 91) with PPI. Their characteristics, medications, and 30-day clinical outcomes were examined. Results: There were no significant differences in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis), bleeding events, and stroke between the two groups. The discontinuation of clopidogrel due to side effects was significantly less frequent than that of ticlopidine (1.1% vs 7.7%, p= 0.003, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that concomitant use of clopidogrel with PPIs might be safer than ticlopidine with PPIs in patients undergoing primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.
机译:背景:最近的研究报道氯吡格雷与质子泵抑制剂(PPI)同时使用可能会降低抗血小板作用并增加冠状动脉支架置入术后不良后果的风险。但是,关于氯吡格雷和噻氯匹定与PPI并用的区别知之甚少,尤其是在亚洲人群中。方法:我们回顾性分析了2006年7月至2010年6月间302例因急性心肌梗死而接受一次支架置入术的连续患者(男性248例,平均年龄66.±12岁)。92%(278/302)的患者接受了PPI。根据氯吡格雷(氯吡格雷组,n = 187)或噻氯匹定(噻氯匹定组,n = 91)将患者分为两组。检查了它们的特征,用药和30天临床结果。结果:两组在30天的主要不良心脏事件(心脏死亡,非致命性心肌梗塞和明确的支架血栓形成),出血事件和中风方面无显着差异。由于副作用而使氯吡格雷停药的频率明显低于噻氯匹定(分别为1.1%和7.7%,p = 0.003)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在接受急性心肌梗死支架置入术的患者中,氯吡格雷与PPI并用可能比噻氯匹定与PPI并用更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号