...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD >Disease tracking markers for Alzheimer's disease at the prodromal (MCI) stage.
【24h】

Disease tracking markers for Alzheimer's disease at the prodromal (MCI) stage.

机译:前驱(MCI)阶段阿尔茨海默氏病的疾病跟踪标记。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Older persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) feature neurobiological Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in 50% to 70% of the cases and develop dementia within the next 5 to 7 years. Current evidence suggests that biochemical, neuroimaging, electrophysiological, and neuropsychological markers can track the disease over time since the MCI stage (also called prodromal AD). The amount of evidence supporting their validity is of variable strength. We have reviewed the current literature and categorized evidence of validity into three classes: Class A, availability of multiple serial studies; Class B a single serial study or multiple cross sectional studies of patients with increasing disease severity from MCI to probable AD; and class C, multiple cross sectional studies of patients in the dementia stage, not including the MCI stage. Several Class A studies suggest that episodic memory and semantic fluency are the most reliable neuropsychological markers of progression. Hippocampal atrophy, ventricular volume and whole brain atrophy are structural MRI markers with class A evidence. Resting-state fMRI and connectivity, and diffusion MR markers in the medial temporal white matter (parahippocampus and posterior cingulum) and hippocampus are promising but require further validation. Change in amyloid load in MCI patients warrant further investigations, e.g. over longer period of time, to assess its value as marker of disease progression. Several spectral markers of resting state EEG rhythms that might reflect neurodegenerative processes in the prodromal stage of AD (EEG power density, functional coupling, spectral coherence, and synchronization) suffer from lack of appropriately designed studies. Although serial studies on late event-related potentials (ERPs) in healthy elders or MCI patients are inconclusive, others tracking disease progression and effects of cholinesterase inhibiting drugs in AD, and cross-sectional including MCI or predicting development of AD offer preliminary evidence of validity as a marker of disease progression from the MCI stage. CSF Markers, such as Abeta 1-42, t-tau and p-tau are valuable markers which support the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. However, these markers are not sensitive to disease progression and cannot be used to monitor the severity of Alzheimer's disease. For Isoprostane F2 some evidence exists that its increase correlates with the progression and the severity of AD.
机译:患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人在50%至70%的病例中患有神经生物学的阿尔茨海默氏病(AD),并在接下来的5至7年内发展为痴呆。目前的证据表明,自MCI阶段(也称为前驱性AD)以来,生化,神经影像学,电生理学和神经心理学的标记物可以随时间追踪疾病。支持其有效性的证据数量不尽相同。我们回顾了当前的文献并将有效性的证据分为三类:A类,多个系列研究的可用性; B类:从MCI到可能的AD疾病严重程度不断提高的患者的单项连续研究或多项横断面研究;和C类,对痴呆症患者(不包括MCI阶段)的多项横断面研究。几项A类研究表明,情节记忆和语义流畅性是进展的最可靠的神经心理学标记。海马萎缩,心室容积和全脑萎缩是具有A类证据的结构性MRI标记。内侧颞白质(海马旁和后扣带)和海马中的静止状态功能磁共振成像和连通性以及弥散MR标记很有希望,但需要进一步验证。 MCI患者淀粉样蛋白负荷的变化值得进一步研究,例如在更长的时间内,以评估其作为疾病进展标记的价值。缺乏适当设计的研究,可能会反映AD前驱阶段神经退行性过程的几种静息状态EEG节律的频谱标记(EEG功率密度,功能耦合,频谱相干性和同步性)。尽管在健康的老年人或MCI患者中对晚期事件相关电位(ERP)的系列研究尚无定论,但其他追踪疾病进展和胆碱酯酶抑制药物在AD中的作用以及包括MCI在内的横断面或预测AD的发展的研究也提供了有效性的初步证据作为MCI阶段疾病进展的标志。 CSF标记,例如Abeta 1-42,t-tau和p-tau是有价值的标记,可支持阿尔茨海默氏病的临床诊断。但是,这些标记物对疾病进展不敏感,因此不能用于监测阿尔茨海默氏病的严重程度。对于Isoprostane F2,存在一些证据表明其增加与AD的进展和严重程度有关。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号