首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Caffeine Research >Caffeine Content Labeling: A Prudent Public Health Policy?-(Regarding Kole, J., and Barnhill, A. Caffeine Content Labeling: A Missed Opportunity for Promoting Personal and Public Health. J Caffeine Res 2013;3:108-113)
【24h】

Caffeine Content Labeling: A Prudent Public Health Policy?-(Regarding Kole, J., and Barnhill, A. Caffeine Content Labeling: A Missed Opportunity for Promoting Personal and Public Health. J Caffeine Res 2013;3:108-113)

机译:咖啡因含量标签:审慎的公共卫生政策?-(关于Kole,J.和Barnhill,A.咖啡因含量标签:缺少促进个人和公共健康的机会。J Caffeine Res 2013; 3:108-113)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Kole and Barnhill (2013) have argued that all products containing added caffeine should be required to include caffeine quantity on their labels, which might allow consumers to regulate their intake of caffeine. For several reasons, we think that thiswould be a misguided policy. First, major dietary sources (i.e., coffee, tea, and chocolate) of caffeine would be exempt from such a policy, as they naturally contain caffeine. Second, there is ample evidence from other foods and beverages containing pharmacologically active compounds (e.g., alcoholic beverages) that simple content labeling has only a very moderate effect on consumer behavior (if any at all). Therefore, policy measures guided to restrict caffeine intake (e.g., by providing maximum content levels in beverages) might be a more prudent policy than labeling requirements.
机译:Kole和Barnhill(2013)认为,应要求所有包含添加咖啡因的产品的标签上都应包含咖啡因含量,这可能使消费者可以调节其咖啡因的摄入量。由于几个原因,我们认为这将是一个误导的政策。首先,咖啡因的主要饮食来源(即咖啡,茶和巧克力)将免于这种政策,因为它们自然含有咖啡因。第二,从含有药理活性化合物的其他食品和饮料(例如酒精饮料)中有充分的证据表明,简单的内容标签仅对消费者的行为产生非常中等的影响(如果有的话)。因此,旨在限制咖啡因摄入量的政策措施(例如,通过提供最大含量的饮料)可能比标签要求更为审慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号