首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research >Limited Clinical Utility of a Genetic Risk Score for the Prediction of Fracture Risk in Elderly Subjects
【24h】

Limited Clinical Utility of a Genetic Risk Score for the Prediction of Fracture Risk in Elderly Subjects

机译:遗传风险评分用于预测老年人骨折风险的有限临床效用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is important to identify the patients at highest risk of fractures. A recent large-scale meta-analysis identified 63 autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with bone mineral density (BMD), of which 16 were also associated with fracture risk. Based on these findings, two genetic risk scores (GRS63 and GRS16) were developed. Our aim was to determine the clinical usefulness of these GRSs for the prediction of BMD, BMD change, and fracture risk in elderly subjects. We studied two male (Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study [MrOS] US, MrOS Sweden) and one female (Study of Osteoporotic Fractures [SOF]) large prospective cohorts of older subjects, looking at BMD, BMD change, and radiographically and/or medically confirmed incident fractures (8067 subjects, 2185 incident nonvertebral or vertebral fractures). GRS63 was associated with BMD (3% of the variation explained) but not with BMD change. Both GRS63 and GRS16 were associated with fractures. After BMD adjustment, the effect sizes for these associations were substantially reduced. Similar results were found using an unweighted GRS63 and an unweighted GRS16 compared with those found using the corresponding weighted risk scores. Only minor improvements in C-statistics (AUC) for fractures were found when the GRSs were added to a base model (age, weight, and height), and no significant improvements in C-statistics were found when they were added to a model further adjusted for BMD. Net reclassification improvements with the addition of the GRSs to a base model were modest and substantially attenuated in BMD-adjusted models. GRS63 is associated with BMD, but not BMD change, suggesting that the genetic determinants of BMD differ from those of BMD change. When BMD is known, the clinical utility of the two GRSs for fracture prediction is limited in elderly subjects. (c) 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
机译:确定骨折风险最高的患者很重要。最近的一项大规模荟萃分析确定了63种与骨矿物质密度(BMD)相关的常染色体单核苷酸多态性(SNP),其中16种也与骨折风险相关。基于这些发现,制定了两个遗传风险评分(GRS63和GRS16)。我们的目的是确定这些GRS在预测老年受试者BMD,BMD变化和骨折风险中的临床实用性。我们对年龄较大的受试者进行了前瞻性队列研究,研究了两个男性(男性骨质疏松性骨折[MrOS]美国,MrOS瑞典)和一个女性(骨质疏松性骨折研究[SOF]),研究了BMD,BMD变化以及影像学和/或医学上的关系。确诊的事件性骨折(8067名受试者,2185起事件的非椎骨或椎骨骨折)。 GRS63与BMD相关(说明了变异的3%),但与BMD变化无关。 GRS63和GRS16均与骨折有关。在调整BMD之后,这些关联的效应大小已大大减小。使用未加权的GRS63和未加权的GRS16与使用相应的加权风险评分发现的结果相似。将GRS添加到基本模型(年龄,体重和身高)后,仅发现骨折的C统计量(AUC)有所改善,而将其进一步添加到模型中时,未发现C统计量有明显改善。针对BMD进行了调整。在BMD调整后的模型中,在基本模型中添加GRS的净重分类改进不大,并且明显减弱。 GRS63与BMD变化有关,但与BMD变化无关,这表明BMD的遗传决定因素与BMD变化的决定因素不同。当已知BMD时,这两种GRS在骨折预测中的临床效用在老年受试者中受到限制。 (c)2014年美国骨矿物质研究学会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号