首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials. >Comparative evaluation of heating ability and biocompatibility of different ferrite-based magnetic fluids for hyperthermia application.
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of heating ability and biocompatibility of different ferrite-based magnetic fluids for hyperthermia application.

机译:热疗应用中不同铁氧体基磁流体的加热能力和生物相容性的比较评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this study, lauric acid-coated, superparamagnetic, nanoparticle-based magnetic fluids of different ferrites (Fe(3)O(4), MnFe(2)O(4), and CoFe(2)O(4)) were prepared and compared in terms of heating ability and biocompatibility to evaluate the feasibility of use in hyperthermia treatment of cancer. All the magnetic fluids prepared had particles of average sizes 9-11 nm. Heating ability of these magnetic fluids was evaluated by calorimetric measurement of specific absorption rate (SAR) at 300 kHz frequency and 15 kA/m field. Fe(3)O(4) and MnFe(2)O(4) showed higher SAR (120 and 97 W/g of ferrite, respectively) than CoFe(2)O(4) (37 W/g of ferrite). In vitro study on BHK 21 cell lines showed dose-dependent cell viability for all the magnetic fluids. Threshold-biocompatible ferrite concentration for all the magnetic fluids was 0.1 mg/mL. Above 0.2 mg/mL, CoFe(2)O(4) was more toxic than the other magnetic fluids. On intravenous injection of different doses (50, 200, and 400 mg/kg body weight) of magnetic fluids in mice, no significant changes in hematological and biochemical parameters were observed for Fe(3)O(4) and MnFe(2)O(4). With CoFe(2)O(4), an increase in SGPT levels at a dose rate of 400 mg/kg body weight was observed, indicating its mild hepatotoxic effect. However, histology of different vital organs showed no pathological changes for all the three magnetic fluids. Further, long term in vivo evaluation of biocompatibility of the lauric acid-coated ferrites is warranted. This study shows that lauric acid-coated, superparamagnetic Fe(3)O(4) and MnFe(2)O(4) may be used for hyperthermia treatment and are to be preferred over CoFe(2)O(4).
机译:在这项研究中,准备了月桂酸涂层的,不同铁氧体(Fe(3)O(4),MnFe(2)O(4)和CoFe(2)O(4)的基于超顺磁性,纳米颗粒的磁性流体)并在加热能力和生物相容性方面进行了比较,以评估用于癌症高温治疗的可行性。所制备的所有磁性流体均具有9-11nm的平均尺寸的颗粒。通过比色法在300 kHz频率和15 kA / m磁场下的比吸收率(SAR)进行比色测量,评估了这些磁性流体的加热能力。 Fe(3)O(4)和MnFe(2)O(4)显示出比CoFe(2)O(4)(37 W / g铁氧体)更高的SAR(分别为120和97 W / g铁氧体)。 BHK 21细胞系的体外研究表明,所有磁性液体的剂量依赖性细胞活力。所有磁性流体的阈值生物相容性铁氧体浓度为0.1 mg / mL。高于0.2 mg / mL,CoFe(2)O(4)的毒性比其他磁性液体更大。在小鼠中静脉注射不同剂量(50、200和400 mg / kg体重)的磁性液体后,未观察到Fe(3)O(4)和MnFe(2)O的血液学和生化参数发生显着变化(4)。与CoFe(2)O(4),观察到SGPT水平在剂量率为400 mg / kg体重时增加,表明其轻度的肝毒性作用。然而,不同的重要器官的组织学显示所有三种磁性液体均无病理变化。此外,保证了对月桂酸涂覆的铁氧体的生物相容性的长期体内评估。这项研究表明,月桂酸涂层,超顺磁性的Fe(3)O(4)和MnFe(2)O(4)可用于热疗,比CoFe(2)O(4)更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号