...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biomechanics >Center of pressure control for balance maintenance during lateral waist-pull perturbations in older adults
【24h】

Center of pressure control for balance maintenance during lateral waist-pull perturbations in older adults

机译:压力控制中心可在老年人的侧腰部拉动时保持平衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

When balance is disturbed, location of the center of pressure (COP) contributes to a person's ability to recover from a perturbation. This study investigated COP control prior to first step lift-off (FSLO) during lateral perturbations in older non-fallers and fallers. 38 non-fallers and 16 fallers received lateral waist-pulls at 5 different intensities. Crossover stepping responses at the intensity level where the largest number of subjects responded with crossover steps were analyzed. Whole-body center of mass (COM) and COP positions in the medio-lateral (ML) direction with respect to the base of support (BOS), and COP velocity were calculated. An inverted pendulum model was used to define the BOS stability boundary at FSLO, which was also adjusted using the COP position at FSLO (functional boundary). No significant differences were found in the COP velocities between fallers and non-fallers (p > .093). However, the COP positions for fallers were located significantly more medial at FSLO (p <= .01), resulting in a significantly reduced functional boundary. Although the stability margins, measures of stability based on the BOS, were significantly larger than zero for fallers (p <= .004), they were not significantly different from zero for the functional boundary, i.e., reaching the functional stability limit. Falters had reduced functional limits of stability in the ML direction, which would predispose them to more precarious stability conditions than non-fallers. This could be a cause for taking more steps than non-fallers for balance recovery as we observed. The functional boundary estimation may be a more sensitive marker of balance instability than the BOS boundary. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:当平衡受到干扰时,压力中心(COP)的位置会影响人从干扰中恢复的能力。这项研究调查了老年非坠落者和坠落者在侧向扰动期间第一步抬高(FSLO)之前的COP控制。 38名非跌倒者和16名跌倒者以5种不同的强度接受侧腰拉力。分析了强度级别的交叉步进响应,在该级别上,最大数量的对象以交叉步进进行了响应。相对于支撑基部(BOS),计算全身重心(COM)和中外侧(ML)方向上的COP位置,并计算COP速度。使用倒立摆模型来定义FSLO处的BOS稳定性边界,也可以使用FSLO处的COP位置(功能边界)进行调整。坠落者和非坠落者之间的COP速度没有发现显着差异(p> .093)。但是,跌倒者的COP位置明显位于FSLO的内侧(p <= .01),从而导致功能边界明显减小。尽管对于下降者而言,基于BOS的稳定性裕度(基于BOS的稳定性度量)显着大于零(p <= .004),但对于功能边界而言,它们与零没有显着不同,即达到了功能稳定性极限。护脚板降低了ML方向的稳定性功能极限,这会使它们比非护脚板更易陷入不稳定的稳定性条件。正如我们观察到的那样,这可能是采取比非储蓄者采取更多措施恢复平衡的原因。功能边界估计可能是比BOS边界更敏感的平衡不稳定标志。 (C)2015由Elsevier Ltd.出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号