...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomechanical engineering. >The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection
【24h】

The effects of different mesh generation methods on computational fluid dynamic analysis and power loss assessment in total cavopulmonary connection

机译:不同网格生成方法对全腔肺连接计算流体动力学分析和功率损耗评估的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The flow field and energetic efficiency of total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) models have been studied by both in vitro experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). All the previous CFD studies have employed the structured mesh generation method to create the TCPC simulation model. In this study, a realistic TCPC model with complete anatomical features was numerically simulated using both structured and unstructured mesh generation methods. The flow fields and energy losses were compared in these two meshes. Two different energy loss calculation methods, the control volume and viscous dissipation methods, were investigated. The energy losses were also compared to the in vitro experimental results. The results demonstrated that: (1) the flow fields in the structured model were qualitatively similar to the unstructured model; (2) more vortices were present in the structured model than in the unstructured model; (3) both models had the least energy loss when flow was equally distributed to the left and right pulmonary arteries, while high losses occurred for extreme pulmonary arterial flow splits; (4) the energy loss results calculated using the same method were significantly different for different meshes; and (5) the energy loss results calculated using different methods were significantly, different for the same mesh.
机译:通过体外实验和计算流体动力学(CFD)研究了全腔肺连接(TCPC)模型的流场和能量效率。以前的所有CFD研究都采用结构化网格生成方法来创建TCPC仿真模型。在这项研究中,使用结构化和非结构化网格生成方法对具有完整解剖特征的现实TCPC模型进行了数值模拟。比较了这两个网格中的流场和能量损失。研究了两种不同的能量损失计算方法,控制量和粘性耗散方法。还将能量损失与体外实验结果进行了比较。结果表明:(1)结构化模型的流场在质量上与非结构化模型相似; (2)与非结构化模型相比,结构化模型中存在更多的涡流; (3)当模型将流量平均分配到左右肺动脉时,两种模型的能量损失最小,而极端的肺动脉血流分裂发生的能量损失最大; (4)对于不同的网格,使用相同方法计算的能量损失结果显着不同; (5)对于相同的网格,使用不同方法计算的能量损失结果显着不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号