...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug discovery today. Technologies >Chemical databases: curation or integration by user-defined equivalence?
【24h】

Chemical databases: curation or integration by user-defined equivalence?

机译:化学数据库:通过用户定义的等效性进行管理或整合?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a wealth of valuable chemical information in publicly available databases for use by scientists undertaking drug discovery. However finite curation resource, limitations of chemical structure software and differences in individual database applications mean that exact chemical structure equivalence between databases is unlikely to ever be a reality. The ability to identify compound equivalence has been made significantly easier by the use of the International Chemical Identifier (InChI), a non-proprietary line-notation for describing a chemical structure. More importantly, advances in methods to identify compounds that are the same at various levels of similarity, such as those containing the same parent component or having the same connectivity, are now enabling related compounds to be linked between databases where the structure matches are not exact.
机译:在公开可用的数据库中有大量有价值的化学信息,可供从事药物发现的科学家使用。但是,策展资源有限,化学结构软件的局限性以及各个数据库应用程序的差异意味着数据库之间确切的化学结构对等不太可能成为现实。通过使用国际化学标识符(InChI)(一种用于描述化学结构的非专有行标记),大大简化了化合物等效物的识别能力。更重要的是,鉴定在各种相似程度上相同的化合物(例如包含相同母体组分或具有相同连通性的化合物)的方法的进步,现在使相关化合物能够在结构匹配不精确的数据库之间链接。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号