...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug information journal >Discussion: 'Incomplete Data inClinical Studies: Analysis, Sensitivity,and SensitivityAnalysis' by GeertMolenberghs
【24h】

Discussion: 'Incomplete Data inClinical Studies: Analysis, Sensitivity,and SensitivityAnalysis' by GeertMolenberghs

机译:讨论:Geert Molenberghs的“临床研究中不完整的数据:分析,敏感性和敏感性分析”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The analysis of clinical trial data in the presence of missing endpoint data is a topic that can directly impact the safety and welfare of future patients because of the effect missing data techniques have on the perception of both the risks and benefits of a new product. There are many different perspectives on the selection of appropriate techniques for the analysis of confirmatory (phase 3) clinical trials with missing data. For example, philosophically there is not complete agreement on whether or not data after treatment discontinuation due to treatment toxicity should be considered as missing at all or simply as representing treatment failure. These ideas can be thought of in terms of the differences between the per-protocol (PP) analysis and the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. In effect, unlike other areas of application such as surveys, the missing data are often caused by the intervention itself rather than an unknown mechanism that leads to either a respondent declining to participate at all or refusing to answer specific questions. This suggests, as pointed out by Dr. Molenberghs, that great care must be taken in making inferences from clinical trials with missing data.
机译:在缺少终点数据的情况下进行临床试验数据的分析是一个可以直接影响未来患者的安全和福利的话题,因为缺失数据技术对新产品的风险和收益的感知都有影响。选择合适的技术来分析具有缺失数据的验证性(第3阶段)临床试验有许多不同的观点。例如,从哲学上说,关于是否应将由于治疗毒性而终止治疗后的数据视为完全缺失还是仅仅代表治疗失败,尚无完全共识。可以根据每个协议(PP)分析和意图治疗(ITT)分析之间的差异来考虑这些想法。实际上,与调查等其他应用领域不同,丢失的数据通常是由干预本身引起的,而不是由未知机制引起的,该机制导致被调查者拒绝参与或拒绝回答特定问题。正如Molenberghs博士所指出的,这表明从数据缺失的临床试验中推断时必须格外小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号