...
首页> 外文期刊>Circulation: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association >Improved outcomes with early collaborative care of ambulatory heart failure patients discharged from the emergency department.
【24h】

Improved outcomes with early collaborative care of ambulatory heart failure patients discharged from the emergency department.

机译:对急诊科出院的动态性心力衰竭患者进行早期合作护理,可以改善治疗效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The type of outpatient physician care after an emergency department visit for heart failure may affect patients' outcomes. Methods and RESULTS: Using the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, we examined the care and outcomes of heart failure patients who visited and were discharged from the emergency department in Ontario, Canada (April 2004 to March 2007). Early collaborative care by a cardiologist and primary care (PC) physician within 30 days after discharge was compared with PC alone. Care for 10 599 patients (age, 74.9+/-11.9 years; 50.2% male) was provided by PC alone (n=6596), cardiologist alone (n=535), or concurrently by both cardiologist and PC (n=1478); 1990 did not visit a physician. Collaborative care patients were more likely to undergo assessment of left ventricular function (57.4% versus 28.7%), noninvasive stress testing (20.1% versus 7.8%), and cardiac catheterization (11.6% versus 2.7%) compared with PC. Drug prescriptions (patients >/=65 years of age) demonstrated higher use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (58.8% versus 54.6%), angiotensin receptor blockers (22.7% versus 18.1%), beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (63.4% versus 48.0%), loop diuretics (84.2% versus 79.6%), metolazone (4.8% versus 3.4%), and spironolactone (19.8% versus 12.7%) within 100 days after emergency department discharge for collaborative care compared with PC. In a propensity-matched model, mortality was lower with PC compared with no physician visit (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.87; P<0.001). Collaborative care reduced mortality compared with PC (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 1.00; P=0.045). Sole cardiology care conferred a trend to increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.41 versus collaborative care; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 2.03; P=0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Early collaborative heart failure care was associated with increased use of drug therapies and cardiovascular diagnostic tests and better outcomes compared with PC alone.
机译:背景:急诊科因心力衰竭就诊后的门诊医生护理类型可能会影响患者的预后。方法和结果:我们使用国家门诊报告系统,检查了访问和从加拿大安大略省急诊科出院(2004年4月至2007年3月)的心力衰竭患者的护理和结局。将出院后30天内由心脏病专家和初级保健(PC)医师进行的早期合作医疗与单独PC进行了比较。仅PC(n = 6596),心脏病专家(n = 535)或心脏病专家和PC并发(n = 1478)同时为10599例患者(年龄74.9 +/- 11.9岁;男性50.2%)提供护理。 ; 1990年没有去看医生。与PC相比,合作医疗患者更可能接受左心室功能评估(57.4%对28.7%),无创压力测试(20.1%对7.8%)和心脏导管检查(11.6%对2.7%)。药物处方(> / = 65岁的患者)表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(58.8%对54.6%),血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(22.7%对18.1%),β-肾上腺素受体拮抗剂(63.4%对48.0%)的使用率更高),急诊科出院后100天内与合作伙伴相比,loop利尿剂(84.2%对79.6%),美拉唑酮(4.8%对3.4%)和螺内酯(19.8%对12.7%)进行协作护理。在倾向匹配模型中,与没有医生就诊相比,使用PC的死亡率较低(危险比0.75; 95%置信区间0.64至0.87; P <0.001)。与PC相比,合作医疗降低了死亡率(危险比0.79; 95%置信区间0.63至1.00; P = 0.045)。唯一的心脏病护理具有增加死亡率的趋势(危险比为1.41,而协作护理为95%的置信区间为0.98至2.03; P = 0.067)。结论:与单独使用PC相比,早期协作性心力衰竭护理与药物治疗和心血管诊断检查的使用增加以及预后更好有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号